Skip to main content

Bracketology in late November

We have a long way to go until March, but I am always interested in the geography of the tournament. In the past decade or so, the committee has prioritized the idea of keeping teams close to home.  As we look at the possible locations where MSU could be playing, we can already start to make some predictions

First, to me it looks quite likely that MSU will get to play in Detroit in the first two rounds. Even if the team stumbles a little, as long as they stay in the Top 10 or so, Detroit is very likely.  The reason is that if you look at the other possible sites, Detroit won't be the closest pod to very many other teams. Those sites are:

Pittsburgh, PA 
Wichita, KS
Dallas, TX 
Boise, ID
Charlotte, NC
Detroit, MI 
Nashville, TN
San Diego, CA

If we look at the current Top 25, only Purdue and Notre Dame would likely prefer Detroit. Cincinnati and Xavier are also possibilities, but they might prefer Pittsburgh.  Of course, the worst case is the dreaded 4-seed that gets shipped out West. That certainly could happen, but it does not seem likely at this point.

If MSU is fortunate enough to be a Top 3ish seed, we will also get preferentially placed in region.  But, the Regional sites are:

Atlanta, GA => 774 miles from East Lansing by Google Maps
Los Angeles, CA => a long way from East Lansing
Boston, MA => 711 miles (if you drive through Canada)
Omaha, NE => 676 miles

So, MSU would seem to prefer the "Midwest" Region in Omaha, but it is not that much closer than either Boston or Atlanta.  If MSU does get the Midwest, then we are likely going to see teams such as Kansas, Wichita State, Notre Dame, Baylor, and Texas A&M who would also prefer this Region.  

If MSU slips up a bit, or if the committee is trying to "optimize" things, I think the East Region in Boston is also fairly likely.  The reason is that there are not that many ranked "east coast" teams this year. Villanova is the only one, really.  In contrast, lots of teams will want the South Region, including Duke, Florida, UNC, Kentucky, Miami, Cincinnati and Xavier.  It just seems very unlikely for MSU to be placed there.

If MSU does wind up in the East, the 2nd place ACC team will likely wind up there as well, if I had to guess.  So, if you don't want a possible Duke rematch until the Final Four, it is best if the Blue Devils win the ACC.  If MSU is a low 2-seed or a 3-seed, the West Region is also in play, where teams like Arizona, Gonzaga, and whoever finishes 2nd in the Big 12 (Baylor?) are likely to wind up.

Again, it's early, but this is how I see things in late November.
  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2026 Edition)

In my opinion, the middle of March is the absolute best time of the year. Over the past two weeks we have witnessed the exciting conclusion of several regular season conference races, followed by 31 conference tournaments. This past weekend, the full 68-team NCAA Tournament bracket was released. Sports fanatics are on the brink of Madness. Who will play the role of Cinderella in the story of the 2026 tournament? Will any survive to reach the second weekend? Which four teams will advance to Indianapolis on that first weekend in April? Which lucky team will end up cutting down the nets?  Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn would win the National Title. There is no foolproof way t...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...

After a strong swing through the state of Indiana, March beckons for Michigan State basketball

I have a bit of a confession to make. Back in December when I was reviewing the overall Big Ten schedule for the Michigan State Spartans, I noticed the back-to-back games at Purdue and at Indiana at the tail end of the conference campaign.  The games were spaced just three days apart, and the Spartan have struggled noticeably in both buildings historically. Outside of possibly the west coast trip in January, this two-game stretch looked like the most subtly challenge portion of the entire schedule. I believed that just getting a split in two games would be a success But the Spartans surprised both me and the college basketball world be rising to the challenge and winning both games. Other Big Ten teams were not as fortunate this weekend as both Purdue and Illinois picked up an additional loss. Table 1 below shows the updated enhanced Big Ten standings following the weekend's action. Table 1 : Enhanced Big Ten standing as of March 2. Michigan's win over Illinois on Friday night ...