Skip to main content

Most Likely Bowl Destination? Tampa

I mentioned this a little in my weekly recap, but I have been thinking out this a little more since then and I am now even more convinced. If MSU wins out to go 9-3, by far the most likely destination is Tampa to play in the Outback Bowl.

Here is my logic: If we consider the possibility of no major upsets in the final two weeks, Big Ten teams will finish with the following records:

Wisconsin: 12-0
Ohio State: 10-2
Penn State: 10-2
MSU: 9-3
Northwestern 9-3
Iowa: 8-4
Michigan: 8-4
No other team over 6-6

If this were to happen, Wisconsin would certainly be in the NY6, and likely the playoffs with a win over OSU in Indy. Also, based on a comparison to the other potentially eligible team, a 10-2 Penn State team is very likely to finish either 10th or 11th at worst, which also puts them in the NY6. Ohio State is a bit of a wild card. If they win the B1G, they will stay in the NY6, if they lose to drop to 10-3, then they are borderline.

One factor is the Orange Bowl. If a B1G team is selected for the Orange Bowl, which is contracted to take an ACC team to play the highest ranked SEC or Big Ten team or Notre Dame not in the playoffs, then the Citrus Bowl cannot take a Big Ten team. However, this does really matter so much. If all three top tier B1G team stay in the NY6, it is pretty likely that one of them is in the Orange Bowl, and then the Outback Bowl takes MSU as the next highest ranked B1G team. However, if OSU falls out of the NY6 due to a loss in Indy, it is unlikely Wisconsin or Penn State will be ranked in the 5-9 range (Wisconsin will be higher and Penn State lower). The Orange Bowl will then likely take the loser of the SEC title game and Ohio State will get the Citrus Bowl.

But, even if somehow the Big Ten gets 3 teams in the NY6 and none of them are in the Orange Bowl (for example if Georgia beats Alabama in the SEC title game and Bama ends the season ranked 5th), MSU still will likely go to Tampa. The reason is that in the new Playoff/NY6 era bowl contracts, there is a "no repeat" stipulation that states, "[The Outback Bowl] will feature at least five different Big Ten schools over six-year agreement." Basically all B1G Bowls have this policy. The last two Big Ten teams to play is the Outback Bowl were... Iowa and Northwestern. So, even if the Citrus Bowl is available, they Big Ten contract more-or-less would demand that the Citrus Bowl take Northwestern to avoid a repeat leaving MSU once again in Tampa.

That all said, there is one team that could mess this all up, and that is Michigan. (Depending on how much you like Tampa, this might be a good or bad thing). If Michigan beats Wisconsin and/or Ohio State, the Wolverines will move up and the upset team will slide down, and this whole balance gets disrupted. If Michigan winds up 9-3, MSU could conceivably wind up in either the Citrus or Holiday Bowl. But, if Michigan losses both to Wisconsin and Ohio State, a 9-3 MSU team is headed to Tampa.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

March Madness Analysis: Did the Selection Committee Get it Right in 2025?

I will be assembling my "usual" stats-based analysis of the bracket, complete with picks a little later this week (but before Thursday). For now, I had some thought on the bracket. In general, MSU's draw is about as good as fans could expect. I will go into more detail on that later. As for the job that the committee did... I am far from impressed. Once again, there are multiple errors in team selection, seeding, and bracketing as a whole. Let's look at each one in turn. Did the Committee get the right 68 teams? More or less. This is the area where I am the least concerned. As I mentioned yesterday, my metrics had UNC safely in the field and not even in the First Four, but I swapped them out for WVU at the last minute. UNC's single Q1 win gave me too much pause. I felt slightly vindicated when UNC made it.  My biggest beef is with Texas making it in at 19-15. That's just too many loses. Yes, they had 7 Q1 wins, but that also had 5 loses outside of Q1 and an ov...

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2025 Edition)

For my money, we are all of the cusp of the best three weeks of the entire year. We just wrapped up two weeks of conference tournaments, but those were just an appetizer to the main course that is yet to come.  The powers that be gave us the menu on Sunday evening for the feast that is to come. Now it is time to enjoy a brief break and palette cleaner before we all make our selections. But what shall we choose? Which tasty little upset looks the best in the first round? Which teams are most likely to be sweet in the second weekend? Which quartet will comprise the final course? Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title. There is no foolproof way to dominate your...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...