Skip to main content

Michigan State Football Mathematical Season Preview

Summer is here and the time is right... for crunching some numbers related to college football. Over the years, I have developed a rather complex system for analyzing an upcoming college football season. Now that we are into the month of July and the preseason magazines have hit the stands, it is time to break out the slide rule and see what insights we can gain about the 2021 season.

I have explained my methodology in detail previously. Briefly, I have developed a power ranking system for college football that does a decent job of projecting point spreads, and therefore also projecting win probabilities. Using this data, it is possible to (among other things) simulate an entire college football season in order to estimate various season odds. Systems such as ESPN's FPI make similar calculations in the preseason.

One of the key inputs to my model is an estimate of relative strengths of each team, which in the preseason I create from the collection of preseason magazines and websites that rank all 130 FBS teams. The FPI is one of the source that I use for an input. However, my calculations include a subtle, but important twist that I believe make my predictions more accurate and useful. I consider the historical uncertainty in the preseason rankings themselves.

I have recently updated my spreadsheets and run the numbers for the 2021 season. Over the coming weeks, I will report here on what I have found. Today, I will dig into the simulation results for the Michigan State Spartans. After that, I will take a broader look at the Big Ten Conference. I then plan to summarize the rest of the Power Five, then the Group of Five and predictions of the teams that will make the playoffs and play in the New Year's Six Bowls games. Finally, I will offer this season's first dose of Bad Betting Advice based on some of the season odds.

Let's begin.

What to Expect from MSU in 2021

Well, right off the bat I have to tell that the preseason magazines are not at all optimistic about the Spartans' chance in Coach Mel Tuckers sophomore campaign. As a result, the math is not particularly kind.

The preseason rankings for the Spartans range from the mid-50s from EPSN's FPI and Bill Connelly's S&P+ system. Athlons and Lindy's have MSU in the mid 70s. Phil Steele is the least optimistic and has Michigan State ranked No. 87 out of 130 FBS teams. As a result, my "consensus" preseason ranking for the Spartans is No. 74. Not great, but it is what it is.

Based on this preseason ranking, and the rankings of all of MSU opponents, I am able to project point spreads and win probabilities for all 12 of MSU's scheduled regular season games. Note that these calculations do take into account the known uncertainty of the preseason rankings. I therefore consider these numbers to be the most accurate one that we can generate, knowing what we know today (which is honestly not much). Nonetheless, here is Figure 1.





Figure 1: Projected point spreads and win probabilities for each of MSU's 12 regular season games in 2021. Odds are calculated from the full season Monte Carlo simulation utilizing the historical uncertainty of preseason rankings.

Based on this Figure, MSU's games can be roughly divided into four different groups. First, there are the two games (and I must note, only two games) where MSU is projected to be the favorite: the Week Two game against FCS foe Youngstown State (MSU -23, 95 percent odds to win), and the Week Five game against Western Kentucky (-10, 76 percent) where MSU is is likely to be a double digit favorite. I should mention here that I do not track FCS power rankings at all, so this line is very speculative.

The next cluster of games is composed of three contests were MSU projects to be a narrow underdog with a line of less than five points and with odds of a victory between roughly 40 and 50 percent. Those games are the Week Four clash with Nebraska (+4.5, 39 percent), the Week Six game at Rutgers (+2.5, 43 percent), and Week 11 game versus Maryland (+0.5, 49 percent or basically a push). 

While it would obviously be much better if MSU was projected to be the favorite in each of the five games mentioned so far, each of those games in clearly winnable, even if the Spartans actually are just the 74th best team in the country. The odds shown above suggest that MSU is mostly like to win three of those five games list so far.

The next batch of games form another trio. In this case, it includes games where MSU is projected to be between a five and 10 point underdog, with odds to win in upset fashion between roughly 25 and 30 percent. Those include the Week One road trip to Chicago to face Northwestern (+9.5, 25 percent), the Week Eight game against archrival Michigan (+7.5, 31 percent), and the Week Nine contest at Purdue (also +7.5, 31 percent). 

The early lines for MSU's game against Northwestern are closer to seven points, which suggests that Vegas has a slightly higher opinion of MSU than the preseason magazines. Or, perhaps they have less faith in Northwestern. It is hard to say. Either way, the probabilities do suggest MSU is likely to win one of the three games listed above. I will leave it for you to guess which game has my vote.

Finally, in the remainder of MSU's games, the Spartans project to be double digit underdogs. Three of the four games also happen to be on the road. They are the Week Three game at Miami (+17.5, 11 percent), the Week Seven game at Indiana (+15, 15 percent), and the final two games of the season at Ohio State (+22.5, six percent) and versus Penn State (+13.5, 18 percent). The math suggests the Spartans have a 50-50 shot to steal a victory somewhere in this group of four games.

Win Distribution

The same set of data from Figure 1 can be parsed in a different way to show the odds that MSU may win anywhere from zero to 12 games. The result of this calculation is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Win distributions calculated for MSU's 2021 regular season assuming the preseason rankings are accurate and then considering the historical uncertainty of those rankings.

In this case, I show two sets of data. The solid blue bars are derived by taking the uncertainty of the preseason rankings into account. In other words, it uses the same data used in Figure 1. The other set of data (the green striped bars) assumes that the preseason rankings are correct. Estimations that you may see from places like ESPN will resemble the striped green bars. My solid blue bars are likely more accurate.

In both cases, the expected numbers of wins are very similar. If the preseason rankings are correct, MSU would be expected to win a total of 4.1 games, which I will note is equal to the preseason over/under values that I have seen for the Spartans. When I factor in the uncertainty of these rankings, MSU expected win total increases slightly to 4.4 wins (because there is more upward potential when a team is projected to be below average). The distribution also broadens noticeably.

This data is very consistent with the analysis that I have for Figure 1. MSU is most likely to win three of the easiest five games on the schedule, and one of the games between Northwestern, Purdue, and Michigan to yield a final record of 4-8.

But, the data in Figure 2 allows us to give some additional season odds. For example, if the preseason rankings are accurate, MSU would need to win four games in upset fashion in order to become bowl eligible. I calculate those odds at only 14 percent. In this scenario, the odds of MSU winning seven games or more is less than four percent, and the odds of going 8-4 or better are less than one percent.

If you are a Spartan fan, those numbers are a bit depressing. Fortunately, Figure 2 gives some insight into the likelihood of some more optimistic scenarios. When the historical uncertainty of the rankings are considered, MSU still has about a 50 percent chance to win between three and five games. However, the odds for bowl eligibility double to 28 percent. 

The odds for MSU to win seven or more games are around 16 percent and an 8-4 record or better has odds of eight percent. Even a 9-3 record has as three percent chance. So, if you happen to be an optimist, there is your fuel for the fire. For the pessimists out there, my simulation also suggests that MSU has about an 18 percent chance to win two games or less.

What If...

The analysis of Figure 2 begs some additional questions. If we allow ourselves to imagine scenarios where MSU is better (or worse) than the No. 74 team in the country. How good does MSU need to be such that a 6-6 record (or better) can be expected? With the power of #math, we can answer that question as well, as I have shown below in Figure 3.



Figure 3: Changes in MSU's expected win total if the Spartans true strength is equal to several other teams. The data points are labeled with the team MSU would need to emulate as well as the number of games MSU would be favored to win in that scenario.

Here, I am recalculating the expected win total for MSU if I artificially increase (or decrease) the Spartans' power ranking to match that of other notable Big Ten or Power Five teams. As discussed in detail above, the nominal Spartan preseason ranking of No. 74 projects MSU to be favored in just two games, but with an expected win total of just over four games. 

The encouraging news is the MSU does not have to be significantly better than predicted in order to put themselves into position to be bowl eligible. If the Spartans can play more like a top 50 team (such as where Purdue is projected) the expected win total rises to over 5.0. The "break even point" for bowl eligibility is for MSU to be a borderline top 40 team, similar in strength to Northwestern.

This make the opening weekend game in Evanston particular intriguing. If MSU can win that game or at least be very competitive, it will give me a lot more confidence that this team get to or above .500. If the Spartans struggle, it could be a very long year... unless, of course, the Wildcats are a lot better than we think.

If we allow ourselves to think even more optimistically, a 7-5 record begins to look more feasible if the Spartans can play like a Top 35 team (such as Minnesota) but the curve get a bit steeper after that. In order to expect a record of 8-4 or better, the Spartans would need to be a Top 20 team or better. 

A quick look back at MSU's schedule illustrates why. The Spartans face four teams projected in the Top 25 (Miami, Indiana, Penn State, and Ohio State) and must play three of those teams on the road. Even a team as strong as borderline top 10 Wisconsin might struggle to get to 10-2 with MSU's schedule and even Alabama's expected win total just clears 10.0.

For members of Team Pessimism, I will note that even if MSU is actually a little worse than predicted, the expected win total still stays above 3.0 even if MSU flirts with mere top 100 status.

Now that we have a clear understanding of what to expect from MSU, the next most logic step is to take a closer look at the rest of the Big Ten. Until next time, enjoy, stay tuned, and Go Green. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...

After a strong swing through the state of Indiana, March beckons for Michigan State basketball

I have a bit of a confession to make. Back in December when I was reviewing the overall Big Ten schedule for the Michigan State Spartans, I noticed the back-to-back games at Purdue and at Indiana at the tail end of the conference campaign.  The games were spaced just three days apart, and the Spartan have struggled noticeably in both buildings historically. Outside of possibly the west coast trip in January, this two-game stretch looked like the most subtly challenge portion of the entire schedule. I believed that just getting a split in two games would be a success But the Spartans surprised both me and the college basketball world be rising to the challenge and winning both games. Other Big Ten teams were not as fortunate this weekend as both Purdue and Illinois picked up an additional loss. Table 1 below shows the updated enhanced Big Ten standings following the weekend's action. Table 1 : Enhanced Big Ten standing as of March 2. Michigan's win over Illinois on Friday night ...

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2026 Edition)

In my opinion, the middle of March is the absolute best time of the year. Over the past two weeks we have witnessed the exciting conclusion of several regular season conference races, followed by 31 conference tournaments. This past weekend, the full 68-team NCAA Tournament bracket was released. Sports fanatics are on the brink of Madness. Who will play the role of Cinderella in the story of the 2026 tournament? Will any survive to reach the second weekend? Which four teams will advance to Indianapolis on that first weekend in April? Which lucky team will end up cutting down the nets?  Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn would win the National Title. There is no foolproof way t...