At halftime Saturday, there was cause for concern in the stands and on the sideline at Spartan Stadium. Visiting Eastern Michigan had just marched 78 yards on 13 plays, mostly on the ground, to cut Michigan State’s lead to seven.
Despite that lead, Eastern Michigan had outgained Michigan State 162-143 and held the ball for 6 1/2 minutes longer. For the second time in two weeks, the Spartans were struggling to put away a Mid-American Conference opponent.
Entering the season, fans did not know what to expect from the first year of the Pat Fitzgerald era in East Lansing. Still and moving images available to the public during the offseason had been limited. The Week 1 performance was fine, but hardly inspiring. Seven quarters into a new era of Spartan football, doubt was creeping in, and the defense was the immediate concern.
“There was a lot of not very happy people on our defensive headphones and defensive staff when we went in at halftime,” Fitzgerald said.
There were plenty of unhappy people in the stands and in their living rooms, too.
But the MSU staff turned that anger into energy, fueling a dominant second-half performance. The Spartans outgained the Eagles 329-57 after halftime and outscored them 21-0.
It was the type of performance Spartan fans have awaited for at least a year. It was the first real sign that Michigan State’s program may be on the rise.
Yes, it was only one half against a lower-level MAC opponent. Still, the energy and execution with which the Spartans have responded after halftime in both games are noticeable.
The team’s entire vibe feels different. It also feels familiar. It feels like Spartan football again. Bumps along the road are inevitable, and one very likely awaits next week in South Bend.
I could be wrong, but the Spartans’ trajectory appears to be pointing up. Then again, I could be right.
Week 2 Betting Results
![]() |
| Figure 1: Week 2 results showing actual point differentials relative to the opening spread. |
![]() |
| Table 1: Week 2 upsets based on the opening line, compared with last week's upset projections. |
The week’s biggest upset was Oklahoma State (+21.5) over Oregon, making the Ducks the second Big Ten team this season to lose as a favorite of more than 20 points. Other notable upsets included Duke over Illinois, Michigan over Oklahoma, and Texas over Ohio State.
My algorithm had an OK week, going 3-5 (37.5%). That brought its season record to 4-7 (36%), slightly below my 40% benchmark for upset picks.
FPI went 1-1 (50%) on upset picks, bringing its season record to 1-3 (25%). SP+ endured a miserable 0-6 week, dropping its season tally to 1-7 (12.5%).
Table 2 shows the computers’ results against the opening spread.
![]() |
| Table 2: Results of the highlighted Week 2 picks against the opening spread. |
It was a tough week for the machines against the spread. They could have been right, but they were far more often wrong.
My computer was a miserable 3-12 (20%), although six misses came by fewer than four points. FPI was better at 4-5 (44%), while SP+ was also terrible at 4-12 (25%).
Across all 86 games, my algorithm went 36-50 (42%) ATS, FPI went 45-41 (52%), and SP+ went 34-52 (40%). My computer and SP+ are below .500 for the season, while FPI is barely above water.
Table 3 shows the Week 2 point-total results.
![]() |
| Table 3: Results of the recommended Week 2 point-total wagers |
The point-total results were the week’s lone betting bright spot. My computer went 8-5 (61.5%), lifting its season record to 17-14 (55%).
My analysis of SP+ data did not generate any over/under bets this weekend, so that total remains at 5-2 (62.5%) on the year.
Updated Big Ten Odds and Expected Wins
After Week 2, I reran the full-season Monte Carlo simulation using updated power rankings and their current uncertainty. Table 4 shows the latest Big Ten odds, and Table 5 shows the conference’s updated win-distribution matrix.
All rankings beside team names refer to my computer’s power rankings, not either national poll.
It was a rough week for the Big Ten, and the conference’s public image likely took a hit. The conference went 6-11 ATS, and one cover came from Purdue merely losing by fewer points than expected at home against Wake Forest.
As noted above, Illinois, Oregon, and Ohio State suffered upset losses. Minnesota also lost by 25 at home to Mississippi State despite entering as only a 1.5-point underdog.
Even after those results, Ohio State edged up to No. 2 in my power poll and still owns the conference’s best title odds at 28%. A one-point road loss to a top-five opponent barely hurts a team’s metrics.
No. 7 Penn State (19%) and No. 8 Indiana (19%) are the likeliest challengers.
No. 11 USC has the next-best odds at 8%. No. 21 UCLA, No. 18 Iowa, and No. 15 Michigan each sit near 5%.
Following its surprising win over Oklahoma, Michigan jumped 19 spots and returned to my computer’s top 15.
Updated Season Prospects for the Spartans
National Overview
Let’s take a quick spin around the country.
In the SEC, No. 3 Texas posted the season’s most impressive
win so far, rallying past No. 2 Ohio State. My computer, however, viewed the
one-point home victory as merely meeting expectations in a top-five matchup.
Fair or not, my algorithm was slightly more impressed by No.
5 Alabama’s 28-point road win at Kentucky. The Crimson Tide now lead my SEC
board with a 19.6% chance to win the conference.
Texas is second at 19.4%, with No. 6 LSU (17.3%) and No. 4
Texas A&M (16.3%) also on the lead lap. All four SEC teams rank in this
week’s top six.
In the Big 12, it remains too early to read much into the
results, but that never stops my computer from drawing conclusions.
Preseason favorite Texas Tech delivered a second lackluster
performance against a lower-level opponent, beating Oregon State by 11 on the
road. The Red Raiders fell to No. 30 in my power rankings and fourth on my Big
12 board, with an 11% conference-title chance.
The Big 12 teams on the rise are No. 17 Baylor (17.8%
conference odds), No. 23 Kansas State (14.4%), and No. 27 Utah (16.9%). Utah
routed Arkansas, and Kansas State beat Washington State by 27.
Baylor lost to Auburn in Week 1, but the computer liked its
41-point win over Prairie View A&M. Auburn’s rout of Southern Miss also
strengthened Baylor’s résumé.
The tune is similar in the ACC, where my computer is more
impressed by No. 9 Virginia’s ability to overwhelm overmatched teams than by the
ability of No. 10 Miami and No. 14 SMU to overwhelm other overmatched teams.
Virginia leads my ACC odds at 25.5%, followed by Miami
(20.5%) and SMU (17.8%).
It is early, and these trends could be wrong. They also
could be right.
No. 32 Boise State handled No. 67 Memphis at home in the weekend’s
marquee Group of Six matchup. My computer, however, was more impressed by No.
36 North Dakota State’s road victory over No. 47 Air Force.
North Dakota State has risen to the top of my Group of Five board
with a 23% chance to reach the College Football Playoff. Boise State (13%)
remains second, 10 percentage points behind the Bison.
Rounding out the top five are No. 41 North Texas (11%),
coming off an upset and blowout of UNLV; No. 59 South Florida (7%), which upset
Army; and No. 61 New Mexico (6%), which scored 70 against Mercyhurst.
Against all odds, we have reached the end of the road. As
the Spartans prepare to face the Irish, I will leave you with a familiar
blessing.
May the road rise to meet you. May the wind be always at your back. May the sun shine warm upon your face, and may the rains fall softly upon your fields until we meet again later this week for another installment of Bad Betting Advice.







Comments
Post a Comment