Skip to main content

2012 College Football Preseason Analysis

It is that time of year again!  What time you ask? Fanson baby watch 2012?  Well, yes, but it is also time once again to break open the football spreadsheet.  I introduced the spreadsheet last, year, but just to refresh everyone’s memory, I starting putting the spreadsheet together in grad school and I have been making steady improvements to it over the years.  I used to just track scores and standings, but over time I have refined the algorithms to predict game outcome / point spreads and generate power rankings.  As the 2012 season approaches, I have once again inputted the schedule information into the latest version of the spreadsheet and am taking an early look at what to expect.  If I take the pre-season rankings for each team, convert that to an estimated power ranking, and simulate the season by correcting for a teams performance at home or on the road (roughly a 3-point advantage for the home team), I have been able to predict the final record of all 124 FBS teams.  This year I even expanded the set of data used to generate the pre-season rankings by taking the average of several pre-season publications (including Athlon’s, Lindy’s, Phil Steele, ESPN, and USA Today).  Keep in mind that these results are purely based on math once the pre-season rankings are inputted.  What I found was fairly interesting:

Let’s start with the Big Ten. Here are my projected standings, which each team’s overall record in parenthesis:

Legends Division
1. Michigan State 6-2 (10-2)
1. Nebraska     6-2 (10-2)
1. Michigan     6-2 (8-4)
4. Iowa                       4-4 (8-4)
5. Northwestern 3-5 (7-5)
6. Minnesota   2-6 (6-6)

Leaders Division
1. Wisconsin    6-2 (10-2)
1. Ohio State   6-2 (10-2)
3. Illinois         4-4 (7-5)
4. Penn State   3-5 (6-6)
5. Purdue         2-6 (5-7)
6. Indiana        0-8 (3-9)

I will start first with the Leaders Division, as that is more straightforward.  Wisconsin (ranked #15) and Ohio State (11) are the only top ~40 teams in the Division, and they are predicted to finish in a tie at 6-2.  Wisconsin is projected to also beat OSU head-to-head (as they play in Madison this year), while Wisconsin is projected to lose at Nebraska and at Penn State (barely).  In any event, OSU cannot play in the Big Ten Title game anyway, so it appears to be very likely that the Badgers will once again represent the Leader’s Division in the Big Ten Championship game. 

That being said, I still have my eyes on both Penn State (40) and Purdue (50).  Both teams appear to have “high risk, high reward” type of schedule where I currently have them both losing a lot of close games.  Purdue draws Michigan (8), Wisconsin (15), and Penn State (40) at home does not play MSU (14) or Nebraska (19).  They must travel to OSU (loss), Iowa (47), Illinois (54), and Minnesota (69).  The spreadsheet only has Purdue beating Indiana (96) and Penn State in West Lafayette.  However, if the Boilers are a little better than their preseason ranking of 50 suggests, several of these 6 losses could all of a sudden turn into Ws, including a potential tie-breaking win against the (over-rated?) Badgers.  Similarly, PSU draws both OSU and Wisconsin at home and does not play MSU or UofM.  The spreadsheet has them losing all of their road games (at Illinois, Iowa, Purdue, and OSU), but you have to wonder if they could wind up squeezing a few more wins out of that schedule.  Time will tell, I guess.

Moving on to the Legends Division, things are a bit more complicated.  The spreadsheet predicts a 3-way tie between the three projected Top 20 teams.  MSU (14) is predicted to beat Nebraska (19) in East Lansing, but to lose in Ann Arbor (No!!!!!) and in Madison.  The Wolverines (8) are projected to beat MSU (No!!!!!), but to lose at OSU and at Nebraska.  The Huskers are projected to loss at MSU, beat UofM, but also lose at Ohio State.  Basically, all three teams are predicted to be pretty good and have a pretty similar conference schedule.  So, it is predicted that everything will cancel out.  So, who will match up against the Badgers in early December?  The Wolverine’s tough non-conference schedule (with projected loses to Alabama (3) in Dallas and at Notre Dame (24)) will leave them at 8-4, but that does not appear to come into play.  If I read the tie-breaker rules correctly, the Legends Division representative will be the team out of the three with the best record against all common Big Ten opponents.  The only team that UofM, MSU, and Nebraska all play is OSU… and MSU is the only team predicted to beat OSU.  So, the spreadsheet currently likes an MSU-Wisconsin rematch in Indianapolis in early December, despite the fact the OSU and UofM are both ranked higher in most preseason magazines. 

So, who will win the Big Ten Championship game?  If I take the average of all the preseason magazine rankings, MSU and Wisconsin actually finish in a dead heat.  The spreadsheet picked MSU, but that is only because “M” comes before “W” in the alphabet.  3 out of the 5 preseason polls have Wisconsin over MSU… but I flipped a coin and MSU won, so I will go with the Spartans.  Do Wolverine tears taste like Roses?  Maybe this year they do!

How about the rest of the country?  Well, let’s start with ESPN’s favorite conference: the SEC.  After winning the last 10,000 BCS titles in a row, it is hard not to imagine that the SEC will be a major player this year as well.  However, the spreadsheet thinks otherwise.  The reason?  Parity.  The SEC is projected to have 9 teams in the Top 30 this year.  That means a lot of very tough games, and a high probability that they will simply beat up on each other.  The situation looks particularly brutal in the SEC West. Alabama (3) has the toughest draw, with 4 road games against Top 30 teams: Arkansas (9), LSU (2), Missouri (27), and Tennessee (28). LSU (2) also has a tough draw with road games at Arkansas (9), Florida (21), and Auburn (26).  Of the SEC West’s projected 3 Top 10 teams, Arkansas (9) seems to have the best draw by getting ‘Bama and LSU at home, but they also have to travel to South Carolina (10), Auburn (26), and Texas A&M (31). As a result, the spreadsheet projects that no team in the SEC will finish with fewer than 3 loses.  In fact, the SEC West is projected to have a four-way tie with Arkansas, LSU, Mississippi State, and Auburn all tied at 5-3.  In this scenario, Auburn would actually win the tie-breaker due to its projected home victories against LSU and Arkansas and despite road losses at Mississippi State and Vanderbilt.  Huh.  This may all seem a bit unlikely (especially considering that a similar analysis last year picked LSU to finish 8-4), but in any event, the winner of the SEC West is going to have to win at least 2 tough road games to be in the National Title hunt, and right now Arkansas and Auburn seem to have the edge in schedules. 

On the other side the of the SEC, an edge in schedules may also pay dividends, in this case for South Carolina (10), who I project to edge out Georgia (7) for the title and right to beat Auburn in the SEC title game. The Gamecocks are expected to drop road games at LSU (2) and Florida (21), but they do draw the Bulldogs at home this year.  Georgia must also travel to Auburn (26) and Missouri (27) and are thus projected to finish at 5-3, a game behind USC.  So, if the SEC breaks down as I have outlined above, its 4th best team (USC) will meet its 6th best team (Auburn) in the title game, entirely due to the schedule. 

Moving on to the PAC-12, the situation seems much more straightforward, as the conference is only projected to have 3 top 30 teams: USC (1), Oregon (4), and Stanford (20).  Both USC and Oregon are projected to finish 8-1 in conference play (losing at Stanford and at USC respectively), winning their Divisions by two games, and meeting in the conference title game where #1 ranked USC would be expected to win. 

In the Big 12, the conference appears to be more competitive as 6 of the conferences 10 teams are ranked in the top 25 preseason: Oklahoma (5), West Virginia (12), Texas (13), OK State (18), TCU (18), and Kansas State (23).  This year, the big winner of the schedule sweepstakes appears to be Oklahoma State, who only draws 4 road games, 2 of which are against Kansas (78) and Baylor (43).  I project a 3-way tie between Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and West Virginia at 7-2, but OK State would win the tie breaker due to its projected home wins against WVU and Texas and TCU (projected to finish tied for 4th place).  The key game of the season could be the Oklahoma – TCU game in Dallas to close the Big 12 season, which is currently projected to be a very close TCU win.  A Sooner win would clinch them the conference crown and could vault them into the National Title Game. 

As for the ACC, it appears that schedules may also play a key role here.  Only Florida State (6), Clemson (17), and VA Tech (22) are projected to be Top 25 caliber, but several other teams like UNC (29), NC State (33), and GA Tech (37) are projected to be decent.  In the Coastal Division, both UNC and VA Tech are projected to finish at 6-2, but UNC is projected to beat VA Tech head-to-head in Chapel Hill, which would result in the Tar Heels making an appearance in the ACC Title Game.  In the Atlantic Division, a 7-1 Clemson squad is projected to edge out a 6-2 FSU team, despite losing to the Seminoles head-to-head. Clemson has to play FSU on the road on September 22nd, but after that only has to travel to Wake Forest (66), Duke (67), and Boston College (72).  Clemson even draws interstate rival South Carolina at home and gets a games in Atlanta against Auburn.  Clemson has the schedule to finish 11-1 and be solidly in the National Title hunt, especially after they win the ACC title over UNC.  Florida State’s schedule is not terrible, but they do have to travel to VA Tech and NC State, where they are projected to lose.  However, if the ‘Noles can pull out a victory in either of those two games, they would win the Division and also be in the National Title hunt.

Elsewhere in the nation, Notre Dame (24) is expected to be a borderline Top 25 team, but with road games at Michigan State (14), Oklahoma (5), and USC (1), they project to finish at 9-3 and not be a factor in the national picture.  Similarly, the Big East seems to have descended further into chaos as the top ranked team is projected to be Louisville at only #30.  The Cardinals are projected to win the conference with a 5-2 record due to a head-to-head wins over 5-2 Cincinnati and 5-2 South FloridaLouisville could finish at 10-2 with non-conference wins over Kentucky and UNC, but projected loses at Pitt and Rutgers would likely keep them out of the national discussion.  Nothing exciting predicted here. 

However, they may be some interesting story lines this year in the Mountain West, Conference USA, and the MAC.  With TCU moving on to the Big 12, Boise State (25) appears to be the only big boy left in the Mountain Time Zone.  They may be tested in the final week of the season at Nevada (58), but Boise is projected to go 8-0 and win the conference.  In fact, the only thing they may stop an undefeated season is the Bronco’s stop in East Lansing on opening weekend.  MSU is projected to win, but if they falter, Boise could run the table and be hard to keep out of the BCS title game, especially if MSU were to make the Rose Bowl, as predicted.

In Conference USA, the Knights of Central Florida appear to be the cream of the crop, although the preseason rankings have drastically varying opinions as to how good they will be.  ESPN has them at 15, while Athlon’s has them at 66.  Their average ranking works out to #35, which is much better than the second best team in the conference, Houston at #60.  Due to this factor, UCF is projected to run the table in C-USA and finish 11-1 overall.  They are picked to face and beat SMU (71) in the title game after SMU wins the head-to-head tie-breaker with Houston after both teams finish 7-1.  UCF will face a tough test at Tulsa (61) near the end of the season, but they also get a chance to play Missouri (27) at home (where I project a close win), and Ohio State (11) in Columbus (projected loss).  If the Knights could somehow beat both OSU and Missouri… they could really throw a wrench into the National picture.

In the MAC, the top two teams in the conference are projected to be Ohio (65) and Western Michigan (76).  As luck would have it, both teams also drew very nice schedules in which the toughest road conference game that either team will face is when Ohio travels to Miami-Ohio (90).  Due to this fact, both teams are projected to sweep their divisions and finish 10-2 overall.  Due to its higher ranking, Ohio is projected to win the Conference Championship game and finish with 11 wins!  In the non-conference Ohio is expected to drop road games at Penn State and Marshall, while Western Michigan is projected to lose at Illinois and Minnesota.  I am not sure about you, but none of those teams strike that much fear into me.  I think a 1-loss (or undefeated?) MAC team could be a possibility this year.

For completeness, Florida International (75) is projected to win the Sun Belt Conference while Louisiana Tech (62) is projected to win the watered-down WAC.  Both teams are projected to finish 8-4 and not be a factor on the national stage.

So, if we add this all up, where does it leave us come January, 2013?  Based on the analysis above, the automatic BSC bids go to:

Michigan State (Big Ten Champs) 10-2
South Carolina (SEC Champs) 9-3
Clemson (ACC Champs) 11-1
Oklahoma State (Big 12 Champs) 10-2
USC (PAC 12 Champs) 11-1
Louisville (Big East Champs) 10-2

That leaves four BCS slots left with an additional three teams projected to finish with 11 wins (Oregon, Boise State, and Central Florida).  Oregon would seem to be a lock for an at large bid and with Louisville’s only decent win coming against UNC, I seriously doubt they finish in the BCS Top 16, which would require that the BCS to take either UCF or Boise as an automatic bid.  Boise would have played the tougher schedule and would seem to be a lock to have the higher BCS ranking than Louisville.

So, that leaves two addition slots for the remaining 2 or 3 loss teams.  It seems quite unlikely that the final two teams would come from non-BCS conferences, so the options remaining would be: Oklahoma (10-2), Florida State (10-2), Ohio State (10-2, but ineligible), West Virginia (10-2), Wisconsin (10-3), and Nebraska (10-2) as well as the 3-loss teams from the SEC including LSU (9-3), Georgia (9-3), and Arkansas (9-3).  I suppose Notre Dame might also get consideration at 9-3. 

To figure out who the final two teams are, it is best to go through the BSC selection process.  Based on all the analysis above, if the season were to go this way, the National Title game would pit USC against Clemson as the only 2 BCS teams with only 1 loss.  USC would be expected to win that match-up and take the National Title.  The Rose Bowl would get MSU and would almost certainly snatch up a highly ranked Oregon to keep the Big 10-Pac 12 alliance intact.  Since the Orange Bowl would lose Clemson to the Title game, it would get to pick next, and I would guess that they would pick up a 10-2 Florida State team from the at-large pool to keep the ACC connection (and to generate ticket sales). 

For the January 2013 Bowls, the Fiesta Bowl is next up to pick.  They would get Big 12 representative Oklahoma State and would then have to pick an opponent. In this case, the exact final BCS ranking would play a huge roll, as the Fiesta Bowl could go in several directions.  They could take Boise State, they could take a Big Ten team (likely Nebraska), or they could take a 3-loss SEC team like LSU, Arkansas, or Georgia.  Due to the old Big 12 connection, I suspect the Fiesta Bowl would take Nebraska, so long as they were in the BCS Top 14.  Otherwise, I think they would take one of the SEC teams… maybe Arkansas since they are projected to have beaten LSU the last game of the season.  Following this pick, the remaining picks fall into place as the Sugar Bowl picks next and would match up South Carolina with Boise State (to avoid picking up Louisville) and the Orange Bowl would get the FSU-Louisville game (must see TV, indeed).  The big BCS losers are Oklahoma and West Virginia, as they are projected to be better teams that Nebraska, but the selection order in 2013 makes it hard for any Bowl to pick them up, unless the Fiesta Bowl somehow agrees to take Boise State so that the Sugar Bowl could take another Big 12 team (most likely West Virginia, since they are projected to beat Oklahoma late in the season)

In summary I project the BCS Bowl Match-ups to be:

BCS Title:  USC (1) over Clemson (17)
Rose Bowl:  Oregon (4) over Michigan State (14)
Sugar Bowl: South Carolina (10) over Boise State (25)
Fiesta Bowl: Oklahoma State (16) over Nebraska (19)
Orange Bowl:  Florida State (6) over Louisville (30)

Keep in mind again that all these projections simply assume that the preseason rankings are accurate and than home teams get a standard advantage (about 3 points).  Based only on these factors, only 4 teams out of the projected top 10 will make BCS games.  Schedules matter.  Will any of this come to pass?  It is hard to say.  On any given Saturday almost anything can happen.  But, this analysis suggests an outcome that would occur if all teams are exactly as good the pre-season rankings think that are, a standard home field advantage applies, and all teams have an extremely consistent level of play.  I hope this has been entertaining!

Here are my projected key games that will impact the National Title picture:

09/01 17 Clemson vs. 26 Auburn (in Atlanta) (The winner of this battle teams with good schedules gets an early leg up)
09/24 10 South Carolina @ 17 Clemson (A win could vault Clemson into the National Title game discussion)
10/06 6 Florida State @ 33 NC State (a misstep here could knock the ‘Noles out of the ACC and National Title hunt)
10/20 14 Michigan State @ 8 Michigan
10/27 8 Michigan @ 19 Nebraska
10/27 14 Michigan State @ 15 Wisconsin
11/03 19 Nebraska @ 14 Michigan State
09/29 15 Wisconsin @ 19 Nebraska
10/06 11 Ohio State @ 19 Nebraska
11/24 8 Michigan @ 11 Ohio State
09/29 11 Ohio State @ 14 Michigan State
12/01 5 Oklahoma vs. 18 TCU (in Dallas) (A TCU win could knock the Sooners out of the National Title hunt and even out of a BCS Bowl)
09/08 35 UCF @ 11 Ohio State (if the Buckeye’s choke, the Knight could run the table and create BCS Chaos)
09/01 65 Ohio @ Penn State (if the Lions choke, Ohio could run the table and create BCS chaos)
09/01 25 Boise State @ 14 Michigan State (Boise could also run the table with a win in East Lansing
12/08 Pac-12 Title Game: Oregon vs. USC? (Winner should play in National Title Game)

10/13 3 Alabama @ 27 Missouri
10/20 3 Alabama @ 28 Tennessee
09/23 9 Arkansas @ 31 Texas A&M
10/06 9 Arkansas @ 26 Auburn
09/08 26 Auburn @ 38 Mississippi State
10/20 26 Auburn @ 44 Vanderbilt
9/22 2 LSU @ 26 Auburn
10/06 2 LSU @ 21 Florida 
09/15 3 Alabama @ 9 Arkansas
11/03 3 Alabama @ 2 LSU
11/24 2 LSU @ 9 Arkansas



  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2024 Edition)

For as long as I can remember, I have loved the NCAA Basketball Tournament. I love the bracket. I love the underdogs. I love One Shining Moment. I even love the CBS theme music. As a kid I filled out hand-drawn brackets and scoured the morning newspaper for results of late night games. As I got older, I started tracking scores using a increasing complex set of spreadsheets. Over time, as my analysis became more sophisticated, I began to notice certain patterns to the Madness I have found that I can use modern analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the tournament itself and perhaps even extract some hints as to how the tournament might play out. Last year, I used this analysis to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title in addition to other notable upsets. There is no foolproof way to dominate your office pool, but it is possible to spot upsets that are more likely than others and teams that are likely to go on a run or flame out early.

The Case for Optimism

In my experience there are two kinds of Michigan State fans. First, there are the pessimists. These are the members of the Spartan fan base who always expect the worst. Any amount of success for the Green and White is viewed to be a temporary spat of good luck. Even in the years when Dantonio was winning the Rose Bowl and Izzo was going to the Final Four, dark times were always just around the bend. Then, there are the eternal optimists. This part of the Spartan fan base always bets on the "over." These fans expect to go to, and win, and bowl games every year. They expect that the Spartans can win or least be competitive in every game on the schedule. The optimists believe that Michigan State can be the best Big Ten athletic department in the state. When it comes to the 2023 Michigan State football team, the pessimists are having a field day. A major scandal, a fired head coach, a rash of decommitments, and a four-game losing streak will do that. Less than 24 months after hoi

2023 Final Playoff and New Year's Six Predictions

The conference championships have all been played and, in all honesty, last night's results were the absolute worst-case scenario for the Selection Committee. Michigan and Washington will almost certainly be given the No. 1 and No. 2 seed and be placed in the Sugar Bowl and the Rose Bowl respectively. But there are four other teams with a reasonable claim on the last two spots and I have no idea what the committee is going to do. Florida State is undefeated, but the Seminoles played the weakest schedule of the four candidates and their star quarterbac (Jordan Travis) suffered a season ending injury in the second-to-last game of the regular season. Florida State is outside of the Top 10 in both the FPI and in my power rankings. I also the Seminoles ranked No. 5 in my strength of record metric, behind two of the other three candidates. Georgia is the defending national champions and were previously ranked No. 1 coming into the week. But after losing to Alabama in the SEC Title game,