So far in this year's math-driven college football preview, we have explored the historical accuracy of preseason rankings, looked back at last season, and mapped the potential paths for the 2026 Michigan State Spartans. Today, the focus shifts to the Big Ten race. Strength of Schedule The first piece of the puzzle is relative strength of schedule. Figure 1 summarizes my calculations for the overall schedules of all 18 Big Ten teams. Figure 1: Overall strengths of schedule for the 2026 Big Ten conference. The overall FBS rank is shown in each bar. There are several ways to calculate strength of schedule. My approach starts with preseason power ratings, which I use to generate projected point spreads for every potential college football matchup. I then calculate how many games a reference, borderline Top 25 team would be expected to win against each schedule. For example, against Michigan State's schedule, that reference team would have an expected win total of 7.65 games, or a ...
In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2025 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.2 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is time to shift focus to the 2026 season. Over the years, I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise. For today, I will focus exclusively on what my analysis says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2026 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (...