Skip to main content

MSU-Michigan Rivalry, By the Numbers

It's rivalry week folks!  As we prepare for the big game this weekend, I thought that it might be fun to take a look back at the history of the rivalry.  MSU has won 8 of the last 10 in the series and is looking to push that number to 9 this weekend.  But, as every Michigan fan will tell you, that is only because in some of those years MSU just got lucky, it rained, or Michigan was bad, so it doesn't really count.  But, what do the numbers actually say?

Well, let's start with the overall record for each team in the rivalry, and let's tabulate that as a function of the total number of wins each team in a given year, going back to the 19th century and in the modern era (since MSU joined the Big Ten in 1950):



So, overall, Michigan holds a 69-36 lead (the first line in the table, signifying the record when each team has equal to or greater than 0 wins.)  However, since 1950, Michigan holds only a narrow 36-30 advantage.  

Furthermore, the story gets much more interesting if we look at the rivalry record as a function of each's teams overall win total.  In years when MSU wins at least 6 games, MSU has a 31-22 record against UofM all time and a 26-15 record since 1950.  As MSU's win total increases, so does MSU's record against the Wolverines.  In years where MSU wins 7 or more games, the winning percentage goes up to 65% overall and 68% since 1950.

But, the real eye-opening stats is what happens when MSU wins 8 games or more.  All time, MSU is 20-3 (87%) against the Wolverines when they win 8 games or more in a season. When MSU wins 9 games or more, the record goes to 14-1 (93%).

But, one could argue that these stats are a bit misleading because teams have only recently been playing 11, 12, or 13-games seasons.  That's true, so I thought that a more fair way to compare the data would be to look at the winning percentage instead of just total wins.  That table is shown here:


Once again, in the modern era MSU has a winning record (27-16) against the Wolverines in years when MSU is over 500.  Furthermore, when MSU wins more than 2/3 of its games (65% to be exact) MSU is an astounding 21-2 (91%) against the Wolverines.  Those two loses were in 1955, when the Wolverines gave Duffy Daugherty his only loss on the year, and in 1989 when Perles went 8-4 overall.  That's it.

But, to be fair, the tables also show that Michigan has a winning record against MSU in the years when they have a lot of wins or a high winning percentage.  But, what about years when both teams are good?  For that, I leave you with this table:


A few things stick out in this table.  First, MSU and UofM are simply not good at the same time very often.  They have only both won 8 games or more in the same year 9 time in history, even back to 1890.  If we set the bar at the point where both teams win at least 5, 6, or 7 games, MSU still has a slight edge.  However, if the bar is raised to 8 wins, MSU dominates the rivalry at 7-2.  If the bar is raised further to at least 9 wins, MSU is undefeated. 

So, when you UofM buddy this week tries to tell you that MSU never beats good Michigan teams, educate the poor soul.  Because the truth is exactly the opposite, Michigan rarely, if ever, beats a good MSU team.  So is MSU actually good this year? Well, I think we will all find out on Saturday.

Enjoy your week and as always, Go State, Beat the Shunkbears!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2026 Edition)

In my opinion, the middle of March is the absolute best time of the year. Over the past two weeks we have witnessed the exciting conclusion of several regular season conference races, followed by 31 conference tournaments. This past weekend, the full 68-team NCAA Tournament bracket was released. Sports fanatics are on the brink of Madness. Who will play the role of Cinderella in the story of the 2026 tournament? Will any survive to reach the second weekend? Which four teams will advance to Indianapolis on that first weekend in April? Which lucky team will end up cutting down the nets?  Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn would win the National Title. There is no foolproof way t...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...

After a strong swing through the state of Indiana, March beckons for Michigan State basketball

I have a bit of a confession to make. Back in December when I was reviewing the overall Big Ten schedule for the Michigan State Spartans, I noticed the back-to-back games at Purdue and at Indiana at the tail end of the conference campaign.  The games were spaced just three days apart, and the Spartan have struggled noticeably in both buildings historically. Outside of possibly the west coast trip in January, this two-game stretch looked like the most subtly challenge portion of the entire schedule. I believed that just getting a split in two games would be a success But the Spartans surprised both me and the college basketball world be rising to the challenge and winning both games. Other Big Ten teams were not as fortunate this weekend as both Purdue and Illinois picked up an additional loss. Table 1 below shows the updated enhanced Big Ten standings following the weekend's action. Table 1 : Enhanced Big Ten standing as of March 2. Michigan's win over Illinois on Friday night ...