Skip to main content

An Early Look at MSU's Football Schedule

I have seen a lot of internet chatter recently this week about the over/under for MSU this year, including information that ESPN's FPI predicted MSU to win 8.8 games, which is higher than any over/under line that I have seen (usually 7.5 or 8). I have started to take a look at this and I have some quick thoughts. In brief, my math matches the FPI pretty well.

I usually dog the FPI a bit, but I think ESPN has refined their model a bit and the performance has improved substantially. My only real complaint these days is that the FPI is very conservative with respect to the Vegas Line. Basically, the FPI spits out data that mirror's what Vegas says. But, this is a pretty powerful predictive tool, because you can project several games into the future and extract some good statistics.

As I have blogged about previously, I have my own (admittedly very simple) algorithm that also tends to spit out a fairly accurate point spread for any given college football game. I am in the process of plugging the schedules of all 130 teams into my spreadsheet and doing some other analysis on the full season. In a few weeks I will likely be ready for my annual season preview. But, the Big Ten data is in and I can start to make some comments about the conference race.

Long story short: my math gives the estimated number of MSU wins to be 9.00 with a 90% chance of finishing with at least 8 wins. It agrees pretty well with the FPI and suggests taking the "over" on MSU.

But, this comes with a long list of caveats. First, it assumes that MSU's (and all other team's) preseason rankings are correct. Phil Steele has MSU at #14 is his Power Poll (the one that actually projects the relative strength of teams, independent of their schedule). The FPI agrees and has MSU #14. Althlon says 16, Lindy's says 20, and the S&P+ model is the least optimistic at 23. I usually take a combination of all those rankings for all 130 teams to get a "consensus" ranking of 16. If MSU really is the 16th best team in the country, then I think the numbers above will be borne out. That is what the math says, based on MSU's schedule.

The problem is that, historically speaking, preseason football rankings are not that accurate. A few years ago I estimated that the average deviation between post- and pre-season rankings is 20 slots. I have a way to adjust my probabilities for this uncertainty, but that analysis is a few weeks away. But, in the mean time, we can take a look at MSU's schedule to see why the expected win total is so high, with the assumption that MSU actually is the 16th best team in the country and is as strong as a historically average 16th team.

If I do that, I can estimate the point spread and victory probability for every game on MSU's schedule. My preliminary table is shown here:

[​IMG]

Again, if the preseason rankings are correct, MSU is going to be facing a lot of bad teams, mostly at home. I project MSU to have over a 95% chance to win their 5 easiest games, and over a 90% chance to win their 6th hardest game (home vs. Indiana). Only one of those games ins on the road and that is against Rutgers, who projects to be the worst team MSU will face all year. Based on this data, MSU has a 83% chance of winning all 6 of those game.

Now, you could argue that these spreads seem high, and I don't disagree. The initial line I see for the Tulsa game is closer to 21 points than 37. But, then again, the ASU line (~14) seems in line with what I have seen. If nothing else, my numbers are so close to the FPI that I think the spreads I am projecting must be similar to ESPN's numbers.

In any event, the next 2 hardest games on the schedule (vs. ASU and at NW) pose a bigger challenge, obviously. But, MSU is currently projected to be a 14- and 7-point favorite. The math suggests a 60% chance the MSU wins both games. Combined with the previous results and MSU has a 50-50 shot to win all 8 of their easiest 8 games with an expected win total of 7.4. In other words, as long as MSU is as good as the experts think, wining all 8 of those games is fairly likely and 7 seems like a gimme.

All this does not even consider the toughest 4 games on the docket. MSU is currently projected to have anywhere from a 30% to 60% chance to win those toughest four contests: vs. Penn State, @ Wisconsin, @ Ohio State, and @ Michigan. If these odds hold up, the math suggests that MSU would be expected to win between 1 and 2 of those games (1.6 is the expected value). More specifically, MSU would have an 89% chance of winning at least 1 of those games, a 54% of winning at least 2, and an 18% chance of winning 3 or more. The odds of going 0-fer on the four toughest games is only 11%.

So, you can hopefully see why the math says MSU has a 90% chance to win 8 or more games. Basically, at least 7 wins in the bottom 8 are very likely, and it is very unlikely for MSU to drop all 4 of its toughest games. Again, this assumes MSU is a Top 20 team. But, even if MSU is a bit weaker than expected, there seems to be more margin for error in the schedule due to the fact that MSU is playing so many weak teams at home this year.

So far, I have mostly been focusing on the reasons why this analysis might be too optimistic. But, there is another side to this coin. What happens if MSU stays healthy and actually is a little better than expected? Also, what happens if one or more of MSU's opponents are weaker then expected, especially at the top? Penn State, Wisconsin, Ohio State and Michigan all have question marks. It would not shock me at all if 2-3 of those teams take a major step back this year. Also, what happens if MSU just flat out gets a few good bounces? What is the ceiling? 10 wins? 11? More? It is not that hard to imagine, honestly. I am not saying it will happen, but the path is not that hard to see.

I am planning on posting a lot more analysis as the season approaches. But, on first blush, I think that guarded optimism for MSU this year is warranted.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2024 Edition)

For as long as I can remember, I have loved the NCAA Basketball Tournament. I love the bracket. I love the underdogs. I love One Shining Moment. I even love the CBS theme music. As a kid I filled out hand-drawn brackets and scoured the morning newspaper for results of late night games. As I got older, I started tracking scores using a increasing complex set of spreadsheets. Over time, as my analysis became more sophisticated, I began to notice certain patterns to the Madness I have found that I can use modern analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the tournament itself and perhaps even extract some hints as to how the tournament might play out. Last year, I used this analysis to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title in addition to other notable upsets. There is no foolproof way to dominate your office pool, but it is possible to spot upsets that are more likely than others and teams that are likely to go on a run or flame out early.

The Case for Optimism

In my experience there are two kinds of Michigan State fans. First, there are the pessimists. These are the members of the Spartan fan base who always expect the worst. Any amount of success for the Green and White is viewed to be a temporary spat of good luck. Even in the years when Dantonio was winning the Rose Bowl and Izzo was going to the Final Four, dark times were always just around the bend. Then, there are the eternal optimists. This part of the Spartan fan base always bets on the "over." These fans expect to go to, and win, and bowl games every year. They expect that the Spartans can win or least be competitive in every game on the schedule. The optimists believe that Michigan State can be the best Big Ten athletic department in the state. When it comes to the 2023 Michigan State football team, the pessimists are having a field day. A major scandal, a fired head coach, a rash of decommitments, and a four-game losing streak will do that. Less than 24 months after hoi

2023 Final Playoff and New Year's Six Predictions

The conference championships have all been played and, in all honesty, last night's results were the absolute worst-case scenario for the Selection Committee. Michigan and Washington will almost certainly be given the No. 1 and No. 2 seed and be placed in the Sugar Bowl and the Rose Bowl respectively. But there are four other teams with a reasonable claim on the last two spots and I have no idea what the committee is going to do. Florida State is undefeated, but the Seminoles played the weakest schedule of the four candidates and their star quarterbac (Jordan Travis) suffered a season ending injury in the second-to-last game of the regular season. Florida State is outside of the Top 10 in both the FPI and in my power rankings. I also the Seminoles ranked No. 5 in my strength of record metric, behind two of the other three candidates. Georgia is the defending national champions and were previously ranked No. 1 coming into the week. But after losing to Alabama in the SEC Title game,