Skip to main content

2019 Week 3 Recap: Friday the 13th

In my preview for MSU's game with Arizona State, I made reference to Coach Dantonio being the Exorcist. Like essentially everyone in the college football universe outside of Tempe, I expected MSU's new offense to show progress and MSU's defense to dominate this weekend.  I expected MSU to win comfortably and to see Coach D get to celebrate being MSU's winningest coach of all time in front of 75,000 or so grateful fans.

But, much like the original film that I riffed on, things did not actually go to plan and things did not end well for MSU's high priest of football... at least not on that night. Perhaps scheduling a game against a team with a demonic mascot on the day following a full moon on a Friday the 13th was not a great plan after all.

The 2019 version of MSU still clearly has a lot of demons, and on this particular Saturday night the game played out just like the sequel to a bad slasher movie. For some reason, the kids went back to the lake and Jason (played by Herm Edwards in this reboot) slaughters them all in the end. In the process, the kids seemed to make a series of terrible choices while the audience of 75,000 screamed at them to do something else... anything else.  But, of course they didn't listen.  In the end, the plot was all too familiar and predictable, and most of the audience went home with a sour feeling in their stomach.

But, here's the deal with Friday the 13th. It is basically a fluke.  It only really comes around a about once a year (once every 212 days, to be exact) and it actually has no supernatural power.  It just feels creepy because everyone says it's creepy. On some level, when it comes to MSU football, I have to wonder if we have all fallen into the same superstitious trap.

Don't get me wrong, Saturday sucked. Hard. But, so many different things needed to go wrong for MSU to lose that they are almost hard to count.  There were coaching errors, execution errors, bad calls, slip-and-falls, missed FGs, clock management issues, bad calls, time out management issues, poor spots, injuries, miscommunications, a fumble, and some bad calls.  It was basically a Murphy's Law crap sandwich. But, MSU still almost won.

Some of these problems are very troubling, but a lot of them if not most of them seem correctable and not a long term issue.  Just look at the box score. MSU dominated Arizona State in every category except the score.  While that final score is ultimately the only thing that actually matters, the overall box score should be a better indicator of MSU’s likely performance in the future. The box score may suggest that MSU wins that game maybe 8 or 9 times out of ten (which is exactly what the spread said). If that is true... is this actually a long term problem to be concerned about?

MSU fans are very good and perhaps the best in the business at expected and predicting that bad things are going to happen. (Some of that attitude seems to stem from the whispers at the water cooler from our maize-and-blue frenemies who talk about what they desperately want to be true like it's reality.)  In any event, it seems like a lot of MSU fans want to cancel the rest of the season and shut down the program unless we fire all the coaches and start over. That crowd probably didn't leave their homes on Friday either for fear of walking under a ladder to avoid a black cat holding a broken mirror.

So, superstition aside, what is the reality of the 2019 MSU football team? Are they as good as they showed against Western Michigan and just had a slow start against Tulsa and a bad day against Arizona State? Was Western Michigan the fluke? The truth is likely somewhere in-between. At times like this, I think that it is wise to take a look at the numbers as a reality check.  In order to do that, it's time for:

Week 3 Metrics Update

When I input all of the weekend's results into my computer, this is what I get for the updated odds to win the Big Ten:


As for the updated expected win totals, those are shown here:


If you prefer a more visual representation, here are the expected win total trends for the season to date.



In regards to the overall Big Ten race, things are pretty status quo from last week.  I now have Ohio State to have almost a 90% shot to win the East and Wisconsin to have a 78% chance to win the West.  Overall, Ohio State has over a 50% chance to the Big Ten, which is essentially what our eyeballs are telling us as well.  

While MSU did drop in my overall power rankings from 13 to 17, the rest of the Big Ten took a bit of a slide as well.  When the conference suffers four upset losses (MSU, Maryland, Illinois, and Purdue) and fails to cover and 3 other games (Penn State, Minnesota, and Northwestern) that tends to happen.  The good thing from an MSU perspective is that several of our remaining opponents may actually be a little worse than we think.  The fact that MSU’s expected win total dropped by less than a point (8.95 to 8.16), despite the loss this weekend is the mathematical evidence.  That might be trouble for Ohio State if they are sitting at #5 in the College Football Playoff Poll in late November, but it looks like maybe that is a good trade for MSU fans.

Based on my calculations, MSU still has the 2nd best odds to win the East at 8%.  I also can calculate that MSU has a 39% chance to win at least 9 games and a 75% chance to win 8 games.  These odds are based on the following projected spreads for MSU’s remaining games:
  • MSU (-11.4) at Northwestern (it actually opened at -7)
  • MSU (-22) vs. Indiana 
  • MSU (+15.1) at Ohio State   
  • MSU (+13.9) at Wisconsin   
  • MSU (-9.4) vs. Penn State   
  • MSU (-23.8) vs. Illinois   
  • MSU (-5.2) at Michigan   
  • MSU (-28.5) at Rutgers
  • MSU (-11.9) at Maryland 
OK. I know what you are thinking. My computer has gotten into the bad electrons from behind the shed again. Those numbers look absolutely insane based on what we saw Saturday night, right?  Well, yes.  But, as stated above, when I look at the box score, MSU dominated Arizona State in every category except the score.  Although my calculations do not consider box score statistics, all of the existing score data from the college football landscape is telling us the same story.  Another way to think about this is that there are basically two different ways to explain the results of Saturday’s game:
  1. MSU is simply not that good overall due to poor coaching/play-calling/offense/fill-in-the-blank and will continue to struggle to beat any team with a pulse on defense. MSU is maybe a Top 50ish team in reality.
  2. MSU is actually good enough to be a Top 20ish team, but they lost to Arizona State because  of some “bad luck” (insert your explanation here) and the fact that Arizona State may be better than we think.
It sure feels like option 1, but the math suggests that it might actually be option 2.  If we consider also that Western Michigan won by 47 this weekend against the team that upset Tennessee in Week 1, that also seems to favor Option 2.  I should also mention that if you think my power ranking of 17 is high, ESPN’s FPI actually has us at 16.  Granted, it is still VERY early to put too much stock in this type of projection, but all data tell a story, and this story is perhaps not as scary as it appears from its cover.

National Overview

As usual, here is my chart showing the actual game results in reference to the opening Vegas lines.


Once again, it is clear how much variation there is in the actual results. As for the biggest over-achievers of the week, the top prize goes to Western Michigan, with Ohio State, Navy, Nebraska, Charlotte, Memphis, LA Tech, Oklahoma, Navy, Wake Forest, Duke, and Central Michigan also in that category. As for the under-achievers, this week that was basically just the teams that got upset, most notably Boston College, Purdue, Buffalo, NC State, and Texas Tech, with MSU also right on that 1-standard deviation line. As for the winners Minnesota and Penn State flirted close to the under-achievement line as well.
As for my hots takes on each conference:
  • As stated above, the Big Ten had 4 upsets and 3 other teams not cover. Ohio State looked dominant, Iowa survived, and other than that only Nebraska looked good. Michigan, Rutgers, and Wisconsin were smart to take the week off.
  • Nothing too surprising happened in the SEC this week, although Kansas State did upset Mississippi State. Florida managed to escape Lexington with a win, and Tennessee finally found a team that they could beat... in the FCS subdivision.
  • It was not a great week in the ACC as Boston College suffered one of the more embarrassing losses in recent memory to Kansas, which provided cover such that almost no one noticed when Georgia Tech lost to the Citadel. Then, NC State got upset by a struggling West Virginia team. Let's just give Clemson a bye the Playoffs start
  • By contrast, the Big 12 had a strong week, scoring four upset wins by Kansas , Kansas State, TCU, and West Virginia to go along with covers by Texas and the state of Oklahoma. Iowa State and Texas Tech may have lost two coin-flip games, but on balance, it was a strong week.
  • The Pac-12 took a regional approach this week. The state of Arizona won in upset fashion, the state of Washington covers, the state of Oregon beat up on the FCS, and the state of California and Colorado either got upset or failed to cover.
  • In the Group of Five, UCF not only beat Stanford, they blew them out and I now have the Golden Knights in the Top 10 of my power rankings. Can anyone unseat them as the favorite? Memphis might have a shot in the AAC Title game. Cincinnati and MWest teams like Boise and San Diego State are waiting in the wings in case the Knights somehow implode.
Upset and ATS Performance

Overall, my algorithm has a decent weekend, going 25-23 ATS (52.1%) which brings my total up to 71-68 (51%) for the year.  The FPI once again did not fair as well, going a miserable 18-30 ATS (37.5%). That brings the FPI’s tally to 55-84 (39.6%) for the year.  Ouch!

As for my suggested bets, this was also a horror show this week.  Here is the list for this past week’s preview, with the correct picks highlighted.


That is a dreadful 4-7 (36%) record for the week, bringing the total to 18-16 (53%), which overall is not that bad.

As for upset picks, here is the table for Week 3:


I count a total of 13 upsets based on the opening lines, which is a little higher than the 10.9 predicted by my simulation of the week, but well within the normal range.  My model went 2-2 on upset predictions this week, bring my total for the year to 5-4 (56%), while the FPI went 0 for 3 and is now only 2-6 (25%) year-to-date. 

The MSU upset was the second largest of the week (second only to Kansas’s Freak Friday the 13th upset of BC) based on the Vegas line.  But, the upset of a team where the spread opened over 10 points has already happened 6 other times this year already.  Upsets of this magnitude or larger happen 30-35 times in a given year.

Finally, here is my updated Top 25, after Week 3:
  1. Georgia
  2. Clemson
  3. Ohio State
  4. LSU
  5. Wisconsin
  6. Alabama
  7. Auburn
  8. Oregon
  9. Oklahoma
  10. UCF
  11. Texas
  12. Florida
  13. Iowa
  14. Arizona State
  15. Notre Dame
  16. TCU
  17. Michigan State
  18. Utah
  19. Washington State
  20. Memphis
  21. Missouri
  22. Texas A&M
  23. Iowa State
  24. Virginia
  25. USC
Just like our view on MSU, my power rankings are highly volatile and cannot be trusted too much at his point in the season.  I hope and believe that both are going to get better soon.

That is all for now. Onward to Week 4 and bring on the Wildcats.  As always, enjoy, and Go Green!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2024 Edition)

For as long as I can remember, I have loved the NCAA Basketball Tournament. I love the bracket. I love the underdogs. I love One Shining Moment. I even love the CBS theme music. As a kid I filled out hand-drawn brackets and scoured the morning newspaper for results of late night games. As I got older, I started tracking scores using a increasing complex set of spreadsheets. Over time, as my analysis became more sophisticated, I began to notice certain patterns to the Madness I have found that I can use modern analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the tournament itself and perhaps even extract some hints as to how the tournament might play out. Last year, I used this analysis to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title in addition to other notable upsets. There is no foolproof way to dominate your office pool, but it is possible to spot upsets that are more likely than others and teams that are likely to go on a run or flame out early.

The Case for Optimism

In my experience there are two kinds of Michigan State fans. First, there are the pessimists. These are the members of the Spartan fan base who always expect the worst. Any amount of success for the Green and White is viewed to be a temporary spat of good luck. Even in the years when Dantonio was winning the Rose Bowl and Izzo was going to the Final Four, dark times were always just around the bend. Then, there are the eternal optimists. This part of the Spartan fan base always bets on the "over." These fans expect to go to, and win, and bowl games every year. They expect that the Spartans can win or least be competitive in every game on the schedule. The optimists believe that Michigan State can be the best Big Ten athletic department in the state. When it comes to the 2023 Michigan State football team, the pessimists are having a field day. A major scandal, a fired head coach, a rash of decommitments, and a four-game losing streak will do that. Less than 24 months after hoi

2023 Final Playoff and New Year's Six Predictions

The conference championships have all been played and, in all honesty, last night's results were the absolute worst-case scenario for the Selection Committee. Michigan and Washington will almost certainly be given the No. 1 and No. 2 seed and be placed in the Sugar Bowl and the Rose Bowl respectively. But there are four other teams with a reasonable claim on the last two spots and I have no idea what the committee is going to do. Florida State is undefeated, but the Seminoles played the weakest schedule of the four candidates and their star quarterbac (Jordan Travis) suffered a season ending injury in the second-to-last game of the regular season. Florida State is outside of the Top 10 in both the FPI and in my power rankings. I also the Seminoles ranked No. 5 in my strength of record metric, behind two of the other three candidates. Georgia is the defending national champions and were previously ranked No. 1 coming into the week. But after losing to Alabama in the SEC Title game,