Skip to main content

Parallel Universe March Madness: Day 1

Somewhere out there in the multiverse, there is no COVID-19 and the NCAA Tournament started Thursday as scheduled.  Earlier in the week, I released a possible bracket that exists some subsets of the multiverse. Then, I proceeded to analyze that bracket, complete with upset, Final Four, and the eventual champion.  Today, it is time to take a look at how Day 1 might have gone down.

My method for this fun little exercise was simply to pick one of the outcomes of my Monte Carlo simulations of the tournament.  I used a random number generator to make the picks using the Kenpom projected point spreads for each game.  In this way, the amount of Madness to this particular version of March should be reasonable.

That said, how did the day shake out?  Let's actually start with action on Tuesday and Wednesday night in the First Four:
  • On Tuesday, Nicholls State defeated Southern easily, 81-59 and will face Dayton on Friday in Cleveland.
  • Xavier edged Richmond, 70-69 and will next face West Virginia
  • On Wednesday, Robert Morris easily topped Norfolk State, 78-58 in the early game.  They will face Kansas in Omaha on Friday.
  • Stanford pulled away late to defeat Cincinnati, 73-65.  The Cardinal move on to face Auburn on Thursday in St. Louis
All four of those teams were favored, so there were no surprises in the First Four.

Moving on to the action of Thursday, starting in Albany where the outcomes were:
  • No. 11 East Tennessee State upsets No. 6 Penn State, 77-62
  • No. 3 Seton Hall takes care of No. 14 Hofstra, 76-63
  • No. 3 Villanova got a bit of a scare from No. 14 Belmont, but survived by a score of 73-67
  • No. 6 Iowa takes out No. 11 Wichita State, 74-67
The Nittany Lion's late season slide continued right up until the end.  They got out of the gate slow and could never quite gain their footing, offensively.  Other than Villanova's relatively close game against Belmont, the other three games went to plan.

St. Louis also saw action on Thursday and the results there were:
  • No. 2 Creighton cruises to victory over No. 15 Princeton, 82-55
  • No. 7 Colorado beats No. 10 Indiana, 73-64
  • No. 4 Maryland blows by No. 13 Bradley by a score of 76-59
  • No. 5 Auburn defeats No. 12 Stanford, 73-66
No upsets were recording in St. Louis, and this includes two picks that I would have made: Indiana and Stanford.  

Moving on to the simulated action in Tampa we have
  • No. 4 Louisville beats No. 13 Western Kentucky, 79-57
  • No. 5 BYU survives No. 12 Vermont, 71-65
  • No. 2 Florida State crushes No. 15 Winthrop, 79-62
  • No. 7 Arizona blows out Oklahoma, 86-55
Again, no upsets here either.  But, at least I didn't lose my dark-horse Final Four team, Arizona, in the first round.

Finally, the action in Spokane went down as follows:
  • No. 5 Ohio State takes down No. 12 Liberty, 67-60
  • No. 4 Oregon blows out No. 13 Northern Colorado, 78-54
  • No. 9 Rutgers edges out No. 8 Houston, 68-66 on a late three-pointer to score a minor upset
  • No. 1 Gonzaga easily handles Siena, 81-59
Rutgers' managed to play the game of the day to earn their first win in the Tournament since 1983. But, with only that one upset in Spokane, Day One of Parallel Universe March Madness went into the books with the higher seeds at 14-2, with the only upsets happening is an No. 8 / No. 9 game (Rutgers over Houston) and a No. 6 / No. 11 game (East Tennessee State over Penn State).  Moreover, No. 5 seeds were a perfect 3-0 on Thursday.

If this were the real tournament, I would likely be saying to expect a wild Friday, as the statistics suggest a regression to the mean of seven to eight total upsets in the first Round.  How wild will Friday be?  Stay tuned.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2026 Edition)

In my opinion, the middle of March is the absolute best time of the year. Over the past two weeks we have witnessed the exciting conclusion of several regular season conference races, followed by 31 conference tournaments. This past weekend, the full 68-team NCAA Tournament bracket was released. Sports fanatics are on the brink of Madness. Who will play the role of Cinderella in the story of the 2026 tournament? Will any survive to reach the second weekend? Which four teams will advance to Indianapolis on that first weekend in April? Which lucky team will end up cutting down the nets?  Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn would win the National Title. There is no foolproof way t...
Post a Comment
Read more

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...
Post a Comment
Read more

After a strong swing through the state of Indiana, March beckons for Michigan State basketball

I have a bit of a confession to make. Back in December when I was reviewing the overall Big Ten schedule for the Michigan State Spartans, I noticed the back-to-back games at Purdue and at Indiana at the tail end of the conference campaign.  The games were spaced just three days apart, and the Spartan have struggled noticeably in both buildings historically. Outside of possibly the west coast trip in January, this two-game stretch looked like the most subtly challenge portion of the entire schedule. I believed that just getting a split in two games would be a success But the Spartans surprised both me and the college basketball world be rising to the challenge and winning both games. Other Big Ten teams were not as fortunate this weekend as both Purdue and Illinois picked up an additional loss. Table 1 below shows the updated enhanced Big Ten standings following the weekend's action. Table 1 : Enhanced Big Ten standing as of March 2. Michigan's win over Illinois on Friday night ...
Post a Comment
Read more