Skip to main content

Parallel Universe March Madness: Day 2

Somewhere out there in the multiverse, there is no COVID-19 and the NCAA Tournament started Thursday as scheduled and continued today to wrap up the first round.  I have been using the results of a single Monte Carlo simulation of the tournament to see how one mathematically consistent version of the tournament might have played out.

Day One was fairly slow and only saw two upset in the 16 total games.  Was Friday's action a bit more Mad?  Let's start with action in Cleveland, where MSU finally took the court in the late game:
  • No. 1 Dayton crushed Nicholls State, 80-60
  • No. 8 Providence handled No. 9 USC will relative ease, 78-62
  • No. 10 Texas Tech edged No. 7 Virginia, 65-63 
  • No. 2 Michigan State surged late to beat No. 15 Ohio, 73-65
MSU got off to another slow start and didn't take the lead until the 5:00 minute mark of the second half.  The highly partisan Ohio crowd almost willed the Bobcats to victory.  But... MSU survived and advanced.

In other action, as my analysis predicted, Texas Tech upset Virginia to avenge their overtime loss in the Title Game last year.  This, of course, sets up a rematch of the National Semifinal from last year between MSU and Texas Tech on Sunday.

Turning to action in Greensboro, things got a bit crazy:
  • No. 6 Michigan survived a late charge from No. 11 Utah State to win 73-65
  • No. 14 South Alabama upset No. 3 Duke, 73-67
  • No. 3 Kentucky defeated No. 14 North Dakota State, 72-64
  • No. 11 Xavier took out No. 6 West Virginia, 71-68
With Duke going down, we have our first major upset of the tournament.  This is especially hilarious because:
  1. It's Duke
  2. I totally just picked Duke to make the Title Game
  3. The odds of this upset were much closer to that of a No. 2 / No. 15 game (roughly five percent)
  4. South Alabama would have faced Michigan next, making their path much, much easier
In other words, this is exactly the type of thing that would have actually happened.  March Madness!  Also, Xavier scored another upset in the No. 6 / No. 11 game to bring the first round total to five, so far.

Moving on to action in Omaha, I have
  • No. 1 Kansas pummeled No. 16 Robert Morris, 76-58
  • No. 9 Marquette upset No. 9 LSU, 72-71 on a buzzer beater
  • No. 1 Baylor survived No. 16 Boston University, 69-65
  • No. 8 Saint Mary's beat No. 9 Florida, 68-63
One more No. 9 upset occurred here, bringing the upset total to six.  As for Baylor, the odds did suggest that this was more like a No. 2 / No. 15 match-up and the "results" bore that out.

Finally, the action in Sacramento featured
  • No. 12 New Mexico State upset No. 5 Butler, 66-63
  • No. 4 Wisconsin barely survived against No. 13 UC Irvine, 67-66
  • No. 2 San Diego State brushed past No. 15 Northern Kentucky, 78-56
  • No. 7 Illinois edged No. 10 Arizona State, 71-70
While this was the second most likely No. 12 upset, it has below average odds.

After one round of play in the Parallel Universe NCAA Tournament, a total of seven upsets occurred.  No. 3 Duke, No. 5 Butler, No. 6 Penn State, No. 6 West Virginia, No. 7 Virginia, No. 8 Houston, and No. 8 LSU all lost.  The updated bracket, after Round One, looks like this



While the methodology that I use to make my picks did get the right total number of upsets correct, I only get two correct (LSU and Virginia).  I also would have lost one of my Title game participants (Duke) already.  My bracket would have been pretty busted.

With Round One in the books, our focus now turns to the Round of 32 on Saturday and Sunday... somewhere in a Parallel Universe.  Stay tuned.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

March Madness Analysis: Did the Selection Committee Get it Right in 2025?

I will be assembling my "usual" stats-based analysis of the bracket, complete with picks a little later this week (but before Thursday). For now, I had some thought on the bracket. In general, MSU's draw is about as good as fans could expect. I will go into more detail on that later. As for the job that the committee did... I am far from impressed. Once again, there are multiple errors in team selection, seeding, and bracketing as a whole. Let's look at each one in turn. Did the Committee get the right 68 teams? More or less. This is the area where I am the least concerned. As I mentioned yesterday, my metrics had UNC safely in the field and not even in the First Four, but I swapped them out for WVU at the last minute. UNC's single Q1 win gave me too much pause. I felt slightly vindicated when UNC made it.  My biggest beef is with Texas making it in at 19-15. That's just too many loses. Yes, they had 7 Q1 wins, but that also had 5 loses outside of Q1 and an ov...
Post a Comment
Read more

2024 Week Eight Preview: OK Computer

Playing the first game after a bye week is like waking up from a nap. It is a little tough to predict how the body will respond. If a nap comes at just the right time and lasts for just the right length of time, it can be very refreshing and rejuvenating. But sometimes waking up for a nap can be rough. It can cause a disorienting, groggy feeling like suddenly two plus two equals five and that down is the new up. Based on the way the three weeks prior to the bye week went, last week's break at the midpoint of the season came at exactly the right time for the Spartans. Facing one top five team is challenging enough. Facing two top five teams on consecutive weekends including almost 5,000 miles of travel is something else entirely. But how will the rested Spartans look on the field come Saturday night? It is hard to predict what we are going to get. It is the classic "rest versus rust," million dollar question.  I prefer to be optimistic and to believe that the Spartans will...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2025 Edition)

For my money, we are all of the cusp of the best three weeks of the entire year. We just wrapped up two weeks of conference tournaments, but those were just an appetizer to the main course that is yet to come.  The powers that be gave us the menu on Sunday evening for the feast that is to come. Now it is time to enjoy a brief break and palette cleaner before we all make our selections. But what shall we choose? Which tasty little upset looks the best in the first round? Which teams are most likely to be sweet in the second weekend? Which quartet will comprise the final course? Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title. There is no foolproof way to dominate your...
Post a Comment
Read more