Skip to main content

Parallel Universe March Madness: Day 2

Somewhere out there in the multiverse, there is no COVID-19 and the NCAA Tournament started Thursday as scheduled and continued today to wrap up the first round.  I have been using the results of a single Monte Carlo simulation of the tournament to see how one mathematically consistent version of the tournament might have played out.

Day One was fairly slow and only saw two upset in the 16 total games.  Was Friday's action a bit more Mad?  Let's start with action in Cleveland, where MSU finally took the court in the late game:
  • No. 1 Dayton crushed Nicholls State, 80-60
  • No. 8 Providence handled No. 9 USC will relative ease, 78-62
  • No. 10 Texas Tech edged No. 7 Virginia, 65-63 
  • No. 2 Michigan State surged late to beat No. 15 Ohio, 73-65
MSU got off to another slow start and didn't take the lead until the 5:00 minute mark of the second half.  The highly partisan Ohio crowd almost willed the Bobcats to victory.  But... MSU survived and advanced.

In other action, as my analysis predicted, Texas Tech upset Virginia to avenge their overtime loss in the Title Game last year.  This, of course, sets up a rematch of the National Semifinal from last year between MSU and Texas Tech on Sunday.

Turning to action in Greensboro, things got a bit crazy:
  • No. 6 Michigan survived a late charge from No. 11 Utah State to win 73-65
  • No. 14 South Alabama upset No. 3 Duke, 73-67
  • No. 3 Kentucky defeated No. 14 North Dakota State, 72-64
  • No. 11 Xavier took out No. 6 West Virginia, 71-68
With Duke going down, we have our first major upset of the tournament.  This is especially hilarious because:
  1. It's Duke
  2. I totally just picked Duke to make the Title Game
  3. The odds of this upset were much closer to that of a No. 2 / No. 15 game (roughly five percent)
  4. South Alabama would have faced Michigan next, making their path much, much easier
In other words, this is exactly the type of thing that would have actually happened.  March Madness!  Also, Xavier scored another upset in the No. 6 / No. 11 game to bring the first round total to five, so far.

Moving on to action in Omaha, I have
  • No. 1 Kansas pummeled No. 16 Robert Morris, 76-58
  • No. 9 Marquette upset No. 9 LSU, 72-71 on a buzzer beater
  • No. 1 Baylor survived No. 16 Boston University, 69-65
  • No. 8 Saint Mary's beat No. 9 Florida, 68-63
One more No. 9 upset occurred here, bringing the upset total to six.  As for Baylor, the odds did suggest that this was more like a No. 2 / No. 15 match-up and the "results" bore that out.

Finally, the action in Sacramento featured
  • No. 12 New Mexico State upset No. 5 Butler, 66-63
  • No. 4 Wisconsin barely survived against No. 13 UC Irvine, 67-66
  • No. 2 San Diego State brushed past No. 15 Northern Kentucky, 78-56
  • No. 7 Illinois edged No. 10 Arizona State, 71-70
While this was the second most likely No. 12 upset, it has below average odds.

After one round of play in the Parallel Universe NCAA Tournament, a total of seven upsets occurred.  No. 3 Duke, No. 5 Butler, No. 6 Penn State, No. 6 West Virginia, No. 7 Virginia, No. 8 Houston, and No. 8 LSU all lost.  The updated bracket, after Round One, looks like this



While the methodology that I use to make my picks did get the right total number of upsets correct, I only get two correct (LSU and Virginia).  I also would have lost one of my Title game participants (Duke) already.  My bracket would have been pretty busted.

With Round One in the books, our focus now turns to the Round of 32 on Saturday and Sunday... somewhere in a Parallel Universe.  Stay tuned.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2026 Edition)

In my opinion, the middle of March is the absolute best time of the year. Over the past two weeks we have witnessed the exciting conclusion of several regular season conference races, followed by 31 conference tournaments. This past weekend, the full 68-team NCAA Tournament bracket was released. Sports fanatics are on the brink of Madness. Who will play the role of Cinderella in the story of the 2026 tournament? Will any survive to reach the second weekend? Which four teams will advance to Indianapolis on that first weekend in April? Which lucky team will end up cutting down the nets?  Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn would win the National Title. There is no foolproof way t...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...

After a strong swing through the state of Indiana, March beckons for Michigan State basketball

I have a bit of a confession to make. Back in December when I was reviewing the overall Big Ten schedule for the Michigan State Spartans, I noticed the back-to-back games at Purdue and at Indiana at the tail end of the conference campaign.  The games were spaced just three days apart, and the Spartan have struggled noticeably in both buildings historically. Outside of possibly the west coast trip in January, this two-game stretch looked like the most subtly challenge portion of the entire schedule. I believed that just getting a split in two games would be a success But the Spartans surprised both me and the college basketball world be rising to the challenge and winning both games. Other Big Ten teams were not as fortunate this weekend as both Purdue and Illinois picked up an additional loss. Table 1 below shows the updated enhanced Big Ten standings following the weekend's action. Table 1 : Enhanced Big Ten standing as of March 2. Michigan's win over Illinois on Friday night ...