Skip to main content

Parallel Universe March Madness: Round of 32

If the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is correct, there are an infinite number of universes without the with COVID-19 pandemic. In those universes, the NCAA Tournament just wrapped up its first weekend.  I have been using the results of a single Monte Carlo simulation of the tournament to see how one mathematically consistent version of the tournament might have played out.  Here are those results through the second round.

Midwest Region:
  • No. 1 Kansas beat No. 9 Marquette, 76-63
  • No. 5 BYU eliminated No. 4 Louisville, 70-67
  • No. 3 Villanova sent home No. 6 Iowa, 75-64
  • No. 2 Michigan State pummeled No. 10 Texas Tech, 77-61

(I also put together a simple box score generator, so perhaps the game went like this...)

After their offensive struggles in the first round, Cassius Winston and Rocket Watts more than made up for it in the second round game against Texas Tech. Watts started hot and stayed that way, putting up a game-high 21 points on 9-of-13 shooting (including three of five from three).

In the second half, the Red Raiders tried to contain Watts, but then Cash went off and added 19 points on 8-of-13 shooting (three of four from three) and seven assists.  Aaron Henry also contributed a workman-like 11 points, 10 rebounds, and five assists.

Tillman struggled a bit from floor, hitting only 1-of-5 shots, but did finish with eight points and nine rebounds.  Bingham and Kyle Ahrens provided some punch off the bench with six points each, while Loyer, Brown, and Hall added two points each.  Overall, MSU shot 53 percent from the field and 40 percent from three, although Cash and Watts were the only players to score from deep.  MSU moves on to face Villanova in Indianapolis on Thursday.

As for my original Midwest Region picks, I got three of the four, Kansas, BYU, and MSU.  I did pick Iowa to upset Villanova, but I will take 75 percent.

South Region:
  • No. 8 Saint Mary's upset No. 1 Baylor, 67-65
  • No. 4 Wisconsin ended the season of No. 12 New Mexico State, 68-61
  • No. 6 Michigan eliminated No. 14 South Alabama, 72-64
  • No. 2 Creighton defeated No. 7 Colorado, 71-67

Of course, the upset of Baylor in the second round would have been big news, but it would not have been a shock.  Also, Michigan advancing to the Sweet 16 due to facing weaker than expected opponents in exactly the type of thing that probably would have happened.  (That's the Michigan difference.)  All of a sudden, the South Region looks ripe for the picking.

As for my pre-simulation picks, Creighton was the only team that I would have correctly picked.

West Region:

If you think that the action in the South was wild, here is what my simulation spit out for the West:

  • No. 9 Rutgers upset No. 1 Gonzaga, 71-69
  • No. 5 Ohio State beat No. 4 Oregon, 69-64
  • No. 3 Kentucky defeated No 11 Xavier, 77-60
  • No. 7 Illinois upset No. 2 San Diego State, 67-66
Clearly, this would have been a fantastic result for the Big Ten, and based on how strong the Big Ten is in Kenpom, it is not at all unreasonable.  While it was tempting in my analysis to knock either Baylor or Gonzaga out in the 2nd round, I choose not to. The simulation took out both.  As for my predictions, I only got Ohio State correct as a Sweet 16 participants.

East Region:

Results in the East Region were a bit more tame, with one exception
  • No. 1 Dayton outlasted No. 8 Providence, 71-67
  • No. 4 Maryland took down No. 5 Auburn, 72-66
  • No. 3 Seton Hall sends home No. 11 East Tennessee State, 75-64
  • No. 7 Arizona edged No. 2 Florida State, 72-68
I actually got three of these four picks as well, including the "correct" pick of Arizona over Florida State.  The only difference was I had Penn State advancing to the Sweet 16 instead of getting upset in the first round.  In total, I got correctly "predicted" exactly half of the Sweet 16.

In summary, here is the updated Parallel Universe NCAA Tournament Bracket



The main lesson here is that the variance in the tournament results is very real.  For both the predictions that I made about the tournament and the results of the simulation, I was using the same source data set (Kenpom efficiencies) to generate the results, and yet I still got only half of the picks correct.  There was a Method to my Madness, yet it still didn't work that well.

For now, just like the actual NCAA Tournament, we will take a break for a few days until "play" resumes on Thursday night.  Stay tuned.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2024 Edition)

For as long as I can remember, I have loved the NCAA Basketball Tournament. I love the bracket. I love the underdogs. I love One Shining Moment. I even love the CBS theme music. As a kid I filled out hand-drawn brackets and scoured the morning newspaper for results of late night games. As I got older, I started tracking scores using a increasing complex set of spreadsheets. Over time, as my analysis became more sophisticated, I began to notice certain patterns to the Madness I have found that I can use modern analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the tournament itself and perhaps even extract some hints as to how the tournament might play out. Last year, I used this analysis to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title in addition to other notable upsets. There is no foolproof way to dominate your office pool, but it is possible to spot upsets that are more likely than others and teams that are likely to go on a run or flame out early.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Case for Optimism

In my experience there are two kinds of Michigan State fans. First, there are the pessimists. These are the members of the Spartan fan base who always expect the worst. Any amount of success for the Green and White is viewed to be a temporary spat of good luck. Even in the years when Dantonio was winning the Rose Bowl and Izzo was going to the Final Four, dark times were always just around the bend. Then, there are the eternal optimists. This part of the Spartan fan base always bets on the "over." These fans expect to go to, and win, and bowl games every year. They expect that the Spartans can win or least be competitive in every game on the schedule. The optimists believe that Michigan State can be the best Big Ten athletic department in the state. When it comes to the 2023 Michigan State football team, the pessimists are having a field day. A major scandal, a fired head coach, a rash of decommitments, and a four-game losing streak will do that. Less than 24 months after hoi
Post a Comment
Read more

2023 Final Playoff and New Year's Six Predictions

The conference championships have all been played and, in all honesty, last night's results were the absolute worst-case scenario for the Selection Committee. Michigan and Washington will almost certainly be given the No. 1 and No. 2 seed and be placed in the Sugar Bowl and the Rose Bowl respectively. But there are four other teams with a reasonable claim on the last two spots and I have no idea what the committee is going to do. Florida State is undefeated, but the Seminoles played the weakest schedule of the four candidates and their star quarterbac (Jordan Travis) suffered a season ending injury in the second-to-last game of the regular season. Florida State is outside of the Top 10 in both the FPI and in my power rankings. I also the Seminoles ranked No. 5 in my strength of record metric, behind two of the other three candidates. Georgia is the defending national champions and were previously ranked No. 1 coming into the week. But after losing to Alabama in the SEC Title game,
Post a Comment
Read more