Skip to main content

Parallel Universe March Madness: The Sweet 16

Let's be honest. The world is a pretty scary place right now.  While the real NCAA Tournament was, of course, cancelled, it is a fun distraction to think about what might have happened if the Tournament went ahead as planned.  Over the past few weeks, I have exploring a possible parallel universe where exactly that happened, using the results of a single Monte Carlo simulation.

Under normal circumstances, the Sweet 16 would have played out over the last two days.  How would that have played out?  In at least one specific parallel universe, maybe it went something like this:

Midwest Region Semifinals

In action on Thursday in Indianapolis, the results were as follows:
  • No. 2 Michigan State pulled away from No. 3 Villanova, 75-62
  • No. 1 Kansas beat No. 5 BYU, 71-66
As for the MSU game, perhaps the game went something like this:  MSU's starters struggled mightily from the field in the first half, and trailed early.  With MSU trailing by four at the under twelve minute time out, Coach Izzo went to the bench for a spark, and boy did they deliver.

Marcus Bingham hit a three from the top of key, to spark a run.  Thomas Kithier scored on two offensive rebound put-backs, including a three-point play.  A few minutes later, he even hit a three from the corner in a late shot-clock situation.  Gabe Brown joined the party by hitting a three in transition and getting to the free throw line for four more.  By the time the starters got back into the game, MSU had gone on an 18-to-6 run and led by eight.

The starters took it from there.  Rocket Watts put up a team-high 16 points on 7-of-12 shooting, while Winston chipped in 14 points and 7 assists.  Meanwhile, Xavier Tillman and Aaron Henry struggled from the field, yet dominated defensively and on and glass.  Tillman finished with only 7 points but 12 rebounds, while Henry pitched in 5 points, all on late free throws, and 8 rebounds.

Hall managed to put up only 4 points, but did contribute 5 rebounds.  Kyle Arhens put up 7 points and 4 rebounds, all in the second half.  In general MSU shot poorly, especially early, shooting 36 percent overall and only 27 percent from three.  But, they nonetheless advanced to the Regional Final to face the Tournament's No. 1 overall seed, Kansas.

West Region Semifinals

Also in action on Thursday in Los Angeles, the results were as follows:
  • No. 3 Kentucky blow past No. 7 Illinois, 79-57
  • No. 5 Ohio State ended the season of No. 9 Rutgers, 69-65
This result sets up an unexpected rematch of the December 21st contest between the Wildcats and Buckeyes, which Ohio State won.  Despite the seeds, Kenpom data suggests that Ohio State may have been favored in this high stakes rematch.

East Region Semifinals

In Friday night action in New York City, the simulation spit out the following surprise results.
  • No. 4 Maryland upset No. 1 Dayton, 70-66
  • No. 7 Arizona upset No. 3 Seton Hall, 71-70, I am assuming on a buzzer beater
This would guarantee that the Final Four will have at least one team seeded no higher that a No. 4, which is, of course, completely normal.  This has been the case for the last 10 consecutive tournaments.

South Region Semifinals

Also on Friday night in Houston, the final set of Sweet 16 game were played, with the following results:

  • No. 2 Creighton beats No. 6 Michigan, 72-67
  • No. 8 Saint Mary's upsets No. 4 Wisconsin, 68-62
As for the Michigan loss, I can only imagine that it went down something like this:

Creighton played inspired throughout the game, partially due to a UofM locker room video of the Wolverines celebrating a presumed trip to the Final Four following the Wolverines win over South Alabama and Baylor's upset loss to St. Mary's.

Michigan had previously beaten both No. 2 Creighton and No. 4 Wisconsin earlier in the season, and their players and fans showed clear signs of over-confidence.  UofM players were not available for interviews following the loss.

After these results, the bracket would look like this:



In the simulated Sweet 16, there were 3 total upsets, which is consistent with the simulated and historical averages.  As for my picks, I would have successfully gotten correct four of the Elite 8: Kansas, MSU, OSU, and Arizona.  That might have kept me alive, for now, in my office pool.

Looking ahead to the Elite Eight match-ups, the MSU-Kansas game is the clear marquee match-up and may even have been referred to as the defacto National Title game.  How will those games turn out? Who will make the Final Four?  Just like it was a normal year, we will have our results by Sunday night.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2026 Edition)

In my opinion, the middle of March is the absolute best time of the year. Over the past two weeks we have witnessed the exciting conclusion of several regular season conference races, followed by 31 conference tournaments. This past weekend, the full 68-team NCAA Tournament bracket was released. Sports fanatics are on the brink of Madness. Who will play the role of Cinderella in the story of the 2026 tournament? Will any survive to reach the second weekend? Which four teams will advance to Indianapolis on that first weekend in April? Which lucky team will end up cutting down the nets?  Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn would win the National Title. There is no foolproof way t...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...

After a strong swing through the state of Indiana, March beckons for Michigan State basketball

I have a bit of a confession to make. Back in December when I was reviewing the overall Big Ten schedule for the Michigan State Spartans, I noticed the back-to-back games at Purdue and at Indiana at the tail end of the conference campaign.  The games were spaced just three days apart, and the Spartan have struggled noticeably in both buildings historically. Outside of possibly the west coast trip in January, this two-game stretch looked like the most subtly challenge portion of the entire schedule. I believed that just getting a split in two games would be a success But the Spartans surprised both me and the college basketball world be rising to the challenge and winning both games. Other Big Ten teams were not as fortunate this weekend as both Purdue and Illinois picked up an additional loss. Table 1 below shows the updated enhanced Big Ten standings following the weekend's action. Table 1 : Enhanced Big Ten standing as of March 2. Michigan's win over Illinois on Friday night ...