Skip to main content

Parallel Universe March Madness: The Sweet 16

Let's be honest. The world is a pretty scary place right now.  While the real NCAA Tournament was, of course, cancelled, it is a fun distraction to think about what might have happened if the Tournament went ahead as planned.  Over the past few weeks, I have exploring a possible parallel universe where exactly that happened, using the results of a single Monte Carlo simulation.

Under normal circumstances, the Sweet 16 would have played out over the last two days.  How would that have played out?  In at least one specific parallel universe, maybe it went something like this:

Midwest Region Semifinals

In action on Thursday in Indianapolis, the results were as follows:
  • No. 2 Michigan State pulled away from No. 3 Villanova, 75-62
  • No. 1 Kansas beat No. 5 BYU, 71-66
As for the MSU game, perhaps the game went something like this:  MSU's starters struggled mightily from the field in the first half, and trailed early.  With MSU trailing by four at the under twelve minute time out, Coach Izzo went to the bench for a spark, and boy did they deliver.

Marcus Bingham hit a three from the top of key, to spark a run.  Thomas Kithier scored on two offensive rebound put-backs, including a three-point play.  A few minutes later, he even hit a three from the corner in a late shot-clock situation.  Gabe Brown joined the party by hitting a three in transition and getting to the free throw line for four more.  By the time the starters got back into the game, MSU had gone on an 18-to-6 run and led by eight.

The starters took it from there.  Rocket Watts put up a team-high 16 points on 7-of-12 shooting, while Winston chipped in 14 points and 7 assists.  Meanwhile, Xavier Tillman and Aaron Henry struggled from the field, yet dominated defensively and on and glass.  Tillman finished with only 7 points but 12 rebounds, while Henry pitched in 5 points, all on late free throws, and 8 rebounds.

Hall managed to put up only 4 points, but did contribute 5 rebounds.  Kyle Arhens put up 7 points and 4 rebounds, all in the second half.  In general MSU shot poorly, especially early, shooting 36 percent overall and only 27 percent from three.  But, they nonetheless advanced to the Regional Final to face the Tournament's No. 1 overall seed, Kansas.

West Region Semifinals

Also in action on Thursday in Los Angeles, the results were as follows:
  • No. 3 Kentucky blow past No. 7 Illinois, 79-57
  • No. 5 Ohio State ended the season of No. 9 Rutgers, 69-65
This result sets up an unexpected rematch of the December 21st contest between the Wildcats and Buckeyes, which Ohio State won.  Despite the seeds, Kenpom data suggests that Ohio State may have been favored in this high stakes rematch.

East Region Semifinals

In Friday night action in New York City, the simulation spit out the following surprise results.
  • No. 4 Maryland upset No. 1 Dayton, 70-66
  • No. 7 Arizona upset No. 3 Seton Hall, 71-70, I am assuming on a buzzer beater
This would guarantee that the Final Four will have at least one team seeded no higher that a No. 4, which is, of course, completely normal.  This has been the case for the last 10 consecutive tournaments.

South Region Semifinals

Also on Friday night in Houston, the final set of Sweet 16 game were played, with the following results:

  • No. 2 Creighton beats No. 6 Michigan, 72-67
  • No. 8 Saint Mary's upsets No. 4 Wisconsin, 68-62
As for the Michigan loss, I can only imagine that it went down something like this:

Creighton played inspired throughout the game, partially due to a UofM locker room video of the Wolverines celebrating a presumed trip to the Final Four following the Wolverines win over South Alabama and Baylor's upset loss to St. Mary's.

Michigan had previously beaten both No. 2 Creighton and No. 4 Wisconsin earlier in the season, and their players and fans showed clear signs of over-confidence.  UofM players were not available for interviews following the loss.

After these results, the bracket would look like this:



In the simulated Sweet 16, there were 3 total upsets, which is consistent with the simulated and historical averages.  As for my picks, I would have successfully gotten correct four of the Elite 8: Kansas, MSU, OSU, and Arizona.  That might have kept me alive, for now, in my office pool.

Looking ahead to the Elite Eight match-ups, the MSU-Kansas game is the clear marquee match-up and may even have been referred to as the defacto National Title game.  How will those games turn out? Who will make the Final Four?  Just like it was a normal year, we will have our results by Sunday night.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

March Madness Analysis: Did the Selection Committee Get it Right in 2025?

I will be assembling my "usual" stats-based analysis of the bracket, complete with picks a little later this week (but before Thursday). For now, I had some thought on the bracket. In general, MSU's draw is about as good as fans could expect. I will go into more detail on that later. As for the job that the committee did... I am far from impressed. Once again, there are multiple errors in team selection, seeding, and bracketing as a whole. Let's look at each one in turn. Did the Committee get the right 68 teams? More or less. This is the area where I am the least concerned. As I mentioned yesterday, my metrics had UNC safely in the field and not even in the First Four, but I swapped them out for WVU at the last minute. UNC's single Q1 win gave me too much pause. I felt slightly vindicated when UNC made it.  My biggest beef is with Texas making it in at 19-15. That's just too many loses. Yes, they had 7 Q1 wins, but that also had 5 loses outside of Q1 and an ov...

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2025 Edition)

For my money, we are all of the cusp of the best three weeks of the entire year. We just wrapped up two weeks of conference tournaments, but those were just an appetizer to the main course that is yet to come.  The powers that be gave us the menu on Sunday evening for the feast that is to come. Now it is time to enjoy a brief break and palette cleaner before we all make our selections. But what shall we choose? Which tasty little upset looks the best in the first round? Which teams are most likely to be sweet in the second weekend? Which quartet will comprise the final course? Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title. There is no foolproof way to dominate your...

2024 Week Eight Preview: OK Computer

Playing the first game after a bye week is like waking up from a nap. It is a little tough to predict how the body will respond. If a nap comes at just the right time and lasts for just the right length of time, it can be very refreshing and rejuvenating. But sometimes waking up for a nap can be rough. It can cause a disorienting, groggy feeling like suddenly two plus two equals five and that down is the new up. Based on the way the three weeks prior to the bye week went, last week's break at the midpoint of the season came at exactly the right time for the Spartans. Facing one top five team is challenging enough. Facing two top five teams on consecutive weekends including almost 5,000 miles of travel is something else entirely. But how will the rested Spartans look on the field come Saturday night? It is hard to predict what we are going to get. It is the classic "rest versus rust," million dollar question.  I prefer to be optimistic and to believe that the Spartans will...