Skip to main content

Week Two Preview: Dessert Course

"Life is short. Eat dessert first."

That quote is attributed to the great pastry chef Jacques Torres. He is also known for the phrase: 

“No one can create anything perfectly the first time they try. So, clean up and start over.” 

While I am guessing that Torres was likely not an American football fan, his wisdom seems to translate well to the gridiron. In the sport of college football, the season is certainly short, and many teams tend to start things off with a bit of dessert. As we will see later, the schedule this week is filled with cupcakes and French pastries.

As for the second quote, few teams are perfect in the first game or two. It is a good idea to ease into things with perhaps a sweet confection or two to prep the stomach for the heartier meals to come. 

But, the harsh reality is the this analogy breaks down when it comes to the final sentence in the quote above. College football offers few, if any mulligans. There is no cleaning up and starting over. Once those "Ls" start to accumulate, next season gets closer and closer.

That's why the Michigan State Spartans' first win of the season over Big Ten foe Northwestern on Friday was such a big deal. Starting the season off with a loss would not have been catastrophic, but it would have made the rest of the season an uphill climb. Just making a bowl game would have been a challenge.

But sitting at 1-0, things are certainly looking a bit sweeter for the Green and White. As things currently stand, my math gives the Spartans a 76 percent chance to get to 6-6 and qualify for the post-season. A seven- or even eight-win season all of a sudden seems at least plausible. Things have changes a lot in the last 10 days.

While MSU certainly looked pretty good in Week One, the Spartans certainly were not perfect. I would still like to see improvement in the pass rush, secondary play, and a little better passing attack from sophomore quarterback Payton Thorne. There are still some things that need to be cleaned up.

This week, the Spartans will hopefully get that chance when a frozen delight in the form of the Youngstown State Penguins come to town. Spartan fans are expecting an easy victory and a chance to tune up and tighten some screws after Week One.

However, just like any actual dessert, one must be carefully to chew carefully. Too big of a bite of cake can take down the strongest guy in the room. Last week alone saw five dessert-related causalities by the names of Tulsa, Colorado State, Vanderbilt, Washington, and UNLV. Let's try not to get added to that list.

Picks of the Week

As is my weekly tradition, Figure 1 and 2 below summarize the projected final margins of victory from both my algorithm and ESPN's FPI in each of the 45 games this week that involve two FBS teams in Week 2 as compared to the opening Vegas spread. More detail about these figures and how to read them can be found in last week's preview.

Figure 1: Comparison of the projected final margin of victory based on my algorithm to the opening Vegas Spread for Week Two.

Figure 2: Comparison of the projected final margin of victory based on ESPN's FPI to the opening Vegas Spread in Week Two.

As Michigan State does not play an FBS team this week, the Spartans do not appear in either graph.

In Week One, both computer systems made predictions that were very much in line with the opening Vegas lines. This week, however, things are starting to get interesting. In some cases, there is quite a bit of conflicting information about how good some of these teams really are. Data is still limited, and it is hard to know how to weight what we thought we knew during the summer and what we saw last week.

In my case, I simply average the two pieces of information. I am not sure how ESPN handles it. Either way, there are a lot more upset and picks against the spread that I will recommend this week compared to last. The upset picks are summarized below in Table 1.

Table 1: Upset picks for Week Two

In total, the two computer systems like three upsets each, but only two of them involve Power Five team. I have Syracuse upsetting Rutgers and the big one, Iowa over Iowa State.

I also simulated the week's action and found that a total of 9.6 plus-or-minus 2.5 upsets should be expected this weekend.

As for picks against the spread (ATS) this week, there are a lot, and they are summarized below in Table 2.

Table 2: Picks against the opening spread for Week Two

My metric recommends a total of four bets ATS this week, including EMU to cover versus the Badgers as my top pick on the board. The FPI agrees with that assessment and adds nine additional unique picks to bring the total to 13 for the week.

Historically, my method can consistently perform above 50 percent using the combined wisdom of my algorithm and the FPI. I am on a bit of a sugar rush so far this year, sitting at 4-1 for the season. Hopefully we don't see a crash this weekend.

MSU and Big Ten Overview

Many years ago when I was setting up my football algorithms, I made the conscience choice not to include FCS-level teams in my model. If I were to do so, it would add over 100 additional teams and increase the complexity of my system such that it would be much harder to manage, with limited pay off. It might just give me a tummy ache.

So, when FBS teams play FCS team, I simply treat the game as an exhibition. The result of any FBS-FCS game does not factor into my calculations at all. I treat all FCS teams as if they are equal in strength to roughly the weakest FBS team. As such, I can project a spread, but it is really just a very rough approximation.

So, for the MSU game this week, my computer has no strong opinion as to what will happen. I would expect MSU to tighten some screws and play pretty well. I expect Walker to rack up a lot of yard, unless the coaching staff decides to put him on ice against the Penguins. I expect Thorne to look a little sharper, and I expect the Spartans to win by a lot and enjoy the sweet taste of victory. My not-very-confident computer says MSU 45, Youngstown State 9. Sure. I will go with that.

As for the rest of the Big Ten, the match-ups for Week Two are shown below in Table 3.

Table 3: Summary of Big Ten action in Week Two, included my algorithms' projected scores. The teams shaded in green are projected to cover by my algorithm. The teams shaded red are projected to cover by the FPI

Of the 14 team Big Ten schools, three additional teams (Indiana, Maryland, and Northwestern) are joining the Spartans at the FCS dessert buffet this weekend. Once again Big Ten brethren, chew carefully, and you should all be fine.

Four Big Ten teams (Minnesota, Nebraska, Penn State, Wisconsin) are facing MAC teams, while Purdue is facing a UCONN teams that would struggle to be competitive in the MAC.  The Big Ten schools are all favored in these match-ups, but the computers only have consensus that the Golden Gophers will cover versus Miami of Ohio. 

The most interesting line in this group is Nebraska (-11) versus Buffalo. The computers both have Buffalo covering. If I were the Cornhuskers, I would bring some antacid to tailgate, just in case.

Both Illinois and Rutgers travel to face ACC teams this week. The Illini (+13) are underdogs at Virginia. The computer have the Cavaliers to win, but Illinois to cover. The Scarlet Knight (-2) are wafer thin favorites on the road at Syracuse. The FPI has faith in Rutgers, but my algorithm has them on upset alert.

Finally, Iowa, Michigan, and Ohio State are all playing in very non-dessert-like marquee match-ups this weekend. The Wolverines host Washington this week in a match-up that looked a lot more compelling a week ago. In Week One, Washington was upset by the Montana. In fairness to the Huskies, Montana looked a lot more like Gummy Bears than Grizzly Bears when the schedule came out.

Somehow, the Michigan - Washington spread opened at just one point and then almost instantly rose to almost a touchdown. My algorithm (which was not told about the upset loss) thinks the opening spread was about right. The FPI, however, has the Wolverines by double digits.

Ohio State (-11.5) hosts another Pac-12 North team on Saturday in the Oregon Ducks. The Buckeye looked just OK against Minnesota while the Duck looked outright shaky against Fresno State last weekend. The computers are split as to which team will cover. Either way, the winner is certain to get a boost of confidence this early in the season

But, the game of the week for me is the battle for the "coveted" Cy Hawk trophy as Iowa travels to Ames to face Iowa State (-5). This will mark the first time in history that the two teams have met when both were ranked. 

While the Cyclones are narrow favorites, the Hawkeyes have won the last five games in the series and are coming off a much more impressive performance in Week One. Iowa devoured Indiana, while Iowa State almost needed the Heimlich maneuver versus Northern Iowa. My math currently has the Hawkeyes as the new favorites in the Big Ten West. If they can win this weekend, it is time to start believing.

Notable National Action

As for the rest of the FBS, Table 4 below summarizes the other games that I will have my eye on this weekend.

Table 4: Summary of other notable action in Week Two, included my algorithms' projected scores. 


As I looked through the rest of the games on the schedule this week, it honestly put a bit of a bad taste in mouth. A total of 37 FBS teams are facing an FCS opponent in Week Two. While I am sure these teams will enjoy their little aperitif, us fans are left feeling slightly bitter.

But, there are a few games on the menu that might be worth watching the crawl for the score. In the ACC, it is natural to keep an eye on the Spartans next opponent in Miami. The Hurricanes were humbled by the Crimson Tide last week, but that has happened to the best of us. This week, Miami opened as only a six-point favorite against Appalachian State. If the Cane were to stumble or just scrape by and not cover, this might bode well for MSU's chances next week.

In other ACC action, NC State and Pitt will both go on the road to play an SEC team where Vegas set the opening line at a push. Pitt's game at Tennessee should at least be competitive, but the Wolf Pack's contest at Mississippi State is what interest me. NC State shut out South Florida in Week One in impressive fashion, so much so that my computer now has NC State favored over Clemson to win the Atlantic Division. I am not quite ready to believe that yet, but a win in Starkville would give me pause. The computers both like the Wolf Pack to win.

In Big 12 play, Texas (-3.5) travels to Arkansas which looks to be a fun match-up of future conference foes. The computers both like the Longhorns, but I have this an upset watch. I also have my eye on the Cowboys of Oklahoma State (-14). The computers both like Tulsa to cover and an upset in this intrastate rivalry does not seem out of the question. In other news, Kansas is a 27-point underdog at Coastal Carolina... yikes.

Notre Dame (19.5) faces Toledo this weekend. On paper, that looks as easy as a bomb-pop on a summer day, but after the Irish needed overtime to beat Florida State, I wonder if this might be closer than one might think (even if my computer disagrees)

In the Pac-12, Arizona (-1) hosts San Diego State in a game that could go either way, while California (+9) travels to TCU in a contest the computers feel will be less close. Utah (-6) travels to BYU. That sounds like a rivalry game. That sounds tasty. In the only conference game on the docket, Stanford will visit USC (-14.5) which is not expected to be competitive.

Finally, in SEC play, Missouri (+3) travels to Kentucky in the lone conference game on the menu this week. The winner is likely to be at least the third best team in the SEC East. Texas A&M travels to Denver to face Colorado (-17). I just wonder in the fans will discuss the good-old days when then both used to be in the Big 12. 

Last, but not least, the Florida Gators (-29) will travel to Tampa to face the South Florida Bulls. USF couldn't score against NC State last week, so an upset seems unlikely, but the fact that the Gator agreed to play in Tampa for this game is in itself, notable.

That is all the advice I have for this week. As always, chew your food, enjoy, and Go State, Beat the Penguins!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

March Madness Analysis: Did the Selection Committee Get it Right in 2025?

I will be assembling my "usual" stats-based analysis of the bracket, complete with picks a little later this week (but before Thursday). For now, I had some thought on the bracket. In general, MSU's draw is about as good as fans could expect. I will go into more detail on that later. As for the job that the committee did... I am far from impressed. Once again, there are multiple errors in team selection, seeding, and bracketing as a whole. Let's look at each one in turn. Did the Committee get the right 68 teams? More or less. This is the area where I am the least concerned. As I mentioned yesterday, my metrics had UNC safely in the field and not even in the First Four, but I swapped them out for WVU at the last minute. UNC's single Q1 win gave me too much pause. I felt slightly vindicated when UNC made it.  My biggest beef is with Texas making it in at 19-15. That's just too many loses. Yes, they had 7 Q1 wins, but that also had 5 loses outside of Q1 and an ov...

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2025 Edition)

For my money, we are all of the cusp of the best three weeks of the entire year. We just wrapped up two weeks of conference tournaments, but those were just an appetizer to the main course that is yet to come.  The powers that be gave us the menu on Sunday evening for the feast that is to come. Now it is time to enjoy a brief break and palette cleaner before we all make our selections. But what shall we choose? Which tasty little upset looks the best in the first round? Which teams are most likely to be sweet in the second weekend? Which quartet will comprise the final course? Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title. There is no foolproof way to dominate your...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...