Skip to main content

Week Two Recap: (un)Frozen

Once upon a time, the Michigan State Spartan offense seemed dormant, perhaps even frozen. In the final few year of the Mark Dantonio era, the yards and point seemed harder and harder to come by, and with that, the win total also decreased. The Green and White offense was a bit of a fixer upper, and after the shorted season of 2020 it was unclear if things were improving. It seemed as though program was headed into the unknown and was potentially lost in the woods.

In the summer of 2021, there were signs that the situation might be improving. The staff dipped into the transfer portal for running backs, an offensive lineman, and a quarterback. A few players (such as Matt Allen) who had struggled with injuries appeared to be healthy for the first time in forever. There were signs that a rejuvenated Spartan offense just might show itself come fall.

In the first game of the season, it was pretty clear that things were headed in the right direction. The Spartans put up 38 points and over 500 yards, against a Big Ten opponent, no less. But, over half of those yards and all but one touchdown came from one player: Kenneth Walker III. As in any first installment, it is necessary to see the sequel before we can really pass judgment.

That sequel presented itself this weekend as the Penguins of Youngstown State came to East Lansing for the Spartan home opener. Although the Penguins are just a FCS program, it seems clear that the Spartan offense is thawing nicely and that the Spartans are not just a one-trick reindeer. 

The Green and White once again scored on the first play from scrimmage, this time on a flea-flicker pass to Jayden Reed for 75 yards. Unlike last week, there were multiple Spartans who shared in the offensive onslaught. 

Last week's hero, Walker, only carried the ball seven times for 57 yards and a single touchdown. Meanwhile, Jordon Simmons led the Spartan rushing attack with 121 yards on 16 carries. Elijah Collin and true freshman Donovan Eaglin also chipped in 32 and 33 yards of the total 272 yards on the ground.

Through the air, Jayden Reed led all players with 181 total yards and two score. That said, 11 other Spartans also recorded at least onw catch. Payton Thorne generally was sharper and more accurate than in Week One. 

While, the Spartans cruised to victory, they are still far from a perfect or complete team. One could certainly argue that the offense still left some points on the field and that the defense perhaps could have kept a better lid on the YSU offense. I am also a bit concerned about the apparent growing number of injuries, especially on the defensive line. 

Nonetheless, the Spartans are heating up, just in time for the level of competition to increase as well. If MSU wants a chance to knock off a ranked Miami team on the road next week, they are going to need to continue to improve, and continue to do the next right thing every day in practice. Some things never change.

Week Two Results

As is my weekly tradition, Figure 1 below shows the results of all 45 games in Week Two that featured two FBS level teams.

Figure 1: Results of Week Two showing the actual point differential relative to the opening spread.

As we can see the major overachievers of the week included Houston, Florida Atlantic, North Carolina, Georgia, Purdue, Michigan, Temple, and Virginia. As for the teams that failed badly to cover, yet still won, that includes Boston College, Notre Dame, Minnesota, and Texas A&M.

As for the upsets of the week, those are the games that fall under the red horizontal line. Table 2 below summarizes the upsets for the week in comparison to the computers' predictions.

Table 1: Summary of the upset in Week Two

Week Two only resulted in a total of seven upsets, relative to the opening Vegas lines, which is on the low side of what was expected for the week. The two biggest upsets both involved Pac-12 teams, as Stanford upset USC in Pac-12 after dark action and Oregon put the Buckeye on ice in Columbus.

But, the computers only managed to get one of the total six upset picks correct: Iowa over Iowa State. My algorithm went 1-2 for upset pick this week, but is still over 40 percent for the year. The poor FPI is still waiting for its first correct upset pick of the year.

If I thought that the upset picks had a rough week, as Table 2 shows, the highlighted picks against the spread were even worse.

Table 2: Results of the highlighted picks versus the spread in Week Two

My algorithm only went 1-3 on the first ATS picks that my computer has made all year. The FPI did slightly better, going 5-6 for the week. The combined system is now 9-9 overall, right at 50 percent.

Overall, my algorithm was a chilly 18-27 for the week (40 percent), while the FPI was 24-21 (53 percent). For the year, my algorithm stands at 44-51 (46 percent) while the FPI is doing a little better at 49-46 (52 percent).

While my computer's performance for the week certainly leaves me feeling a bit cold, I suppose that I will just have to let it go and hope that it does better next week.

Updated Big Ten Odds and Expected Wins

With only two weeks now in the books, the Big Ten race continues to be in flux. Table 3 below give the updated rankings, expected wins, strengths of schedule, and season odds for the conference, based on my most recent full-season simulation. It was a strong weekend in the B1G as only Ohio State and Illinois dropped games and only Minnesota and Wisconsin failed to cover the opening spread of the teams that did win.

Table 3: Updated Big Ten rankings, expected wins, strengths of schedule and season odds.

In the Big Ten East, with the Buckeye's loss this week to the Ducks, OSU has dropped to having only the third best division odds behind Penn State (43 percent) and Michigan (23 percent). Both the Nittany Lions and the Wolverines are now ranked in my top 10 with projected records of 11-1. Um... OK, computer.

Rutgers also shot up the charts this week. My computer now has them ranked in the top 20 with almost a 10 percent chance to win the East and favored in eight of their remaining games. As for MSU, the Spartans essentially were frozen in place at No. 42 in my power rankings, which makes sense as I do not track the results of games versus FCS opponents. But, the Spartans' expected win total decreased to 6.34 based entirely on an uptick in MSU's strength of schedule.

In the West, Iowa's big win over the Cyclones on Saturday firmly establishes the Hawkeyes as the current favorite in the Division with 76 percent odds to return to Indianapolis. That said, Iowa will still likely need to beat the Badgers in Madison at the end of October. The other big mover in the West was Minnesota, whose close shave versus Miami-Ohio caused the Gopher's ranking to slide down by over 30 slots in my power rankings.

Table 4 below summarizes the updated win distribution matrix for the Big Ten.

Table 4: Updated Big Ten win distribution matrix after Week Two

As of now, I give the Spartans a 64 percent chance to get at least to .500, a 46 percent chance to get to at least 7 wins, a 29 percent shot at at least an 8-4 record, a 16 percent chance at 9 wins or more, and a seven percent chance to reach the double digit win mark.

I will also note that I currently project Iowa to have a better than 1-in-4 change to run the table in the regular season and Penn State to have a little better than a 10 percent chance to do the same. Note that those two teams play each other in Iowa City on October 9.

A closer look at MSU's remaining schedule

Figure 2 below give my updated projections for the Vegas lines and win probabilities for all of the games remaining on MSU's schedule.

Figure 2: Updates projections for the Vegas line and win probabilities for MSU's remaining schedule

In general, my computer has cooled on MSU's prospects a bit since last week, but this is mostly a reflection of the volatility of the data this early in the season as the algorithm "figures out" how good MSU and all of these opponents really are. 

Several of MSU opponents (Rutgers, Michigan, and Purdue specifically) all had solid weekends and therefore several games that last week projected as toss-ups now look like MSU might be a touchdown or so underdog. These lines will continue to move. 

The Spartans still project as a favorite against Nebraska, Western Kentucky, and Maryland, and a longshot versus Ohio State and Penn State. The game at Indiana is still looks like a toss-up right now.

But, next week's game at Miami all of a sudden looks a but more winnable as the Hurricanes only beat Appalachian State by two points and my computer has MSU as only a 3.5-point dog in next week's game. The actual Vegas line opened at around seven points. Either way, the game now seems winnable if the Spartans can bring their A-game.

National Overview

Finally, let's take a quick look at the key action in the rest of the country this week. As I mentioned in my Bad Betting Advice preview, it was a bit of a quiet week on that front.

In the ACC, the biggest result was NC State's 14-point loss at Ole Miss. As a result, my algorithm has gotten over last week's brain freeze and now agrees with the rest of the world that Clemson is the best team and favorite in the Atlantic Division. In the Coastal Division, the computer sees a near dead heat between the three undefeated teams: Virginia Tech, Pitt, and Virginia. 

Also, it seems clear that ACC-lite Notre Dame is a very overrated. The Irish dropped to No. 27 in my power rankings due to their narrow win over Toledo. In reality, the situation is actual worse, as my computer does even know that Notre Dame's Week One opponent (Florida State) dropped a game this week to Jacksonville State from the FCS.

The Big 12 had a rough week, as Kansas lost to a Sun Belt team (Coastal Carolina) and Texas and Iowa State were both upset. In addition, TCU and Oklahoma both won their games versus Cal and Tulsa, but neither team covered. In the final analysis Oklahoma still projects as the team to beat, but an interesting dark horse has emerged in Kansas State. The Wildcats handled Stanford easily in Week One and then the Cardinal went out and upset USC this week. That caused KSU to shoot up to No. 8 in my current power rankings with the second best conference odds in the Big 12.

In the Pac-12, the big news, of course, was Oregon's upset win at Ohio State, which clearly solidifies the Ducks position as the favorite in the North Division. No other team in the division in currently ranked in my top 50. In the South, Stanford's upset win over USC has elevated UCLA and Arizona State to the position of the teams to beat in that Division. 

In the SEC, things are basically status quo. Georgia is the clear leader in the East. Kentucky's win over Missouri keeps them in the race along with Florida, but the Bulldogs are still big favorites. In the West, Alabama was able to put a bit of distance between themselves and the rest of the Division, thanks in large part to Texas A&M's less-than-impressive win over Colorado. But, all seven West teams are ranked in my top 35, so there is still the potential for some bumps in the road as the season progresses.

In the Group of Five, most of the key contenders for conference and the New Year's Six race beat FCS opponents. Cincinnati still leads the pack in my simulation (32 percent odds to secure the NY6 slot) with Coastal Carolina (15 percent) and UCF (11 percent) within striking distance.

That is all for today. Until next time, enjoy, and Go State, beat the Hurricanes!

P.S. For those interested, here are the additional data tables for the remaining conferences.













Comments

Popular posts from this blog

March Madness Analysis: Did the Selection Committee Get it Right in 2025?

I will be assembling my "usual" stats-based analysis of the bracket, complete with picks a little later this week (but before Thursday). For now, I had some thought on the bracket. In general, MSU's draw is about as good as fans could expect. I will go into more detail on that later. As for the job that the committee did... I am far from impressed. Once again, there are multiple errors in team selection, seeding, and bracketing as a whole. Let's look at each one in turn. Did the Committee get the right 68 teams? More or less. This is the area where I am the least concerned. As I mentioned yesterday, my metrics had UNC safely in the field and not even in the First Four, but I swapped them out for WVU at the last minute. UNC's single Q1 win gave me too much pause. I felt slightly vindicated when UNC made it.  My biggest beef is with Texas making it in at 19-15. That's just too many loses. Yes, they had 7 Q1 wins, but that also had 5 loses outside of Q1 and an ov...

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2025 Edition)

For my money, we are all of the cusp of the best three weeks of the entire year. We just wrapped up two weeks of conference tournaments, but those were just an appetizer to the main course that is yet to come.  The powers that be gave us the menu on Sunday evening for the feast that is to come. Now it is time to enjoy a brief break and palette cleaner before we all make our selections. But what shall we choose? Which tasty little upset looks the best in the first round? Which teams are most likely to be sweet in the second weekend? Which quartet will comprise the final course? Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title. There is no foolproof way to dominate your...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...