Skip to main content

Week Six Recap: Kaboom!

I was a bit nervous about this week's game at Rutgers. My computer saw just a one-point margin of victory for the Michigan State University Spartans. This game looked like a toss-up to me. Fortunately, the Spartans had other plans.

It has been pretty apparent for several weeks now that MSU has an improved offense. But, I don't think anyone was really prepared for the explosiveness the Green and White showed this weekend. Led by Payton "the mad bomber" Thorne, the Spartans put up video-game-like numbers on the Rutgers defense. His favorite target, Speedy Nailor, blew up the Scarlet Knights secondary on multiple occasions.

Just for good measure, Kenneth Walker exploded for the longest play from scrimmage in Spartan history to put the game away as a part of another super breakout performance. I am not sure if we have seen an offense this potent in East Lansing since the 8-bit graphics days when Kirk Gibson was on the sidelines. Spartan fans are justified if they are going a bit berserk.

The crazy thing is that in a few areas, the Spartans didn't even play that well. Special teams and clock management were very "John L. Smith-esque." Coach Tucker from his seat in missile command will certainly have a lot of film to point to this week to keep the pressure on his team to continue to improve.

Either way, MSU is sitting at 6-0 and bowl eligible with just one very manageable game left before a nicely timed mid-season bye. If the Spartan's can shore up all phases of the game at once... how high of a ceiling do the Spartans have?

Sure, the backend is full of pitfalls. Right now, Penn State, Michigan, and Ohio State are all ranked in the top 10... but so are the Spartans. Furthermore, the Green and White get two of those three teams at home.

The Spartans put on a show in Piscataway this weekend. Now, they might just be poised to blow up the entire Big Ten East race. I have a feeling that this weekend was not final salvo that we will see from MSU this year. The rest of the conference better be ready for combat.

Kaboom!

Week Six Results

As is my weekly tradition, Figure 1 below shows the results of all 51 FBS games in Week Six.

Figure 1: Results of Week Six showing the actual point differentials relative to the opening spread.

The overachievers for the week were Ohio State, Cincinnati, Baylor, Kentucky, Colorado State, Houston, TCU, Wisconsin, Coastal Carolina, and Georgia State. No one managed to "underachieve" (i.e. fall outside of the dotted lines) yet still win.

Table 1 below summarizes the upsets in Week Six in comparison to the computer picks this week.

Table 1: Upsets based on the opening Vegas line compared to the upset projections from Week Six

Based on the opening spread, there were only 11 total upsets, which was a couple less then expected, but well within expectations. The two biggest upsets on the board were Florida State (+18) over North Carolina, and Texas A&M (+15) over Alabama. Most of the other upsets were in the Group of Five, but Oregon State, Louisville, and USC also all caught the upset bug this week.

Once again, the computers' picks got blown up this week. My algorithm went 1-4, only getting the Boise State over BYU pick correct, while ESPN's FPI only picked Virginia correctly to go 1-5 for the week. Both systems are struggling to get over 30 percent this year on upset picks, which is about 15 percentage points below their historical performances.

Table 2 below summarizes the computers' picks against the opening spreads for Week Six.

Table 2: Results of the highlighted picks versus the spread in Week Six

In contrast to the upset picks, my algorithm had a very strong week, going 9-4 (almost 70 percent) against the opening line, which bring the year-to-date performance up to 60 percent. The FPI, however, did not do as well. 

My curated FPI picks were just 4-6 (40 percent) which brings the YTD performance down close to .500. The combined performance for the year is also just over 50 percent. The FPI is really dragging me down so far in 2021.

Oddly, when I consider all 51 games, my computer's performance ATS was rather poor. Overall, I was just 21-30 (41 percent) which also happened to match the performance by the FPI. Year-to-date, both metrics are now underwater. My computer is 143-174 (45 percent) while the FPI in only slightly better at 152-165 (48 percent).

Updated Big Ten Odds and Expected Wins

Following the results of Week Six, I have re-run the full-season Monte Carlo simulation using the updated power rankings, including the current uncertainty in those rankings, in order to update the season odds for each team. Table 3 below gives the update for the Big Ten conference.

Table 3: Updated Big Ten rankings, expected wins, strengths of schedule and season odds.

In perhaps the biggest game of the entire weekend, the Iowa Hawkeyes stormed back late to knockoff Penn State in Iowa City to stay undefeated. Ironically, this result did significantly change Iowa's odds to win the Big Ten West, which stayed constant at just under 90 percent. Iowa actually dropped slightly in my power rankings from No. 2 to No. 4.

The reason is that my computer actually had Iowa winning that game by seven points. As such, the Hawkeyes slightly underachieved and the computer concluded that Iowa is actually slightly worse than it previously thought, while Penn State is actually slightly better. This may seem counterintuitive, but this is how it works, once I dig dug more into the data.

Elsewhere in the Big Ten West, my computer was also impressed with Wisconsin's shutout win over Illinois in Champaign in the Brett Bielema Classic. The Badgers grade out with the second toughest schedule overall and to-date and now have the second highest odds in the West at just under six percent. I will also note that despite Nebraska losing another heartbreaker, the Huskers still did better than expectations. My computer now has Wisconsin ranked No. 12 overall and Nebraska ranked No. 14.

I know that those numbers sound crazy, but my computer is implying that those teams are perhaps a lot better than their records indicate. Note that Iowa still has to play both of those teams on the road. The race for the Big Ten West might get interesting afterall.

In the East, my computer is still very high on the Wolverines (45 percent odds to win the Division), but Penn State (33 percent), Michigan State (13 percent) and Ohio State (nine percent) all made up ground and are all currently ranked in my top 10. 

Starting on October 30, those four top teams of the Big Ten East will all start to play each other in a six-game round robin that battle zone will decide the fate of the East. 

The updated Big Ten win distribution matrix is shown below in Table 4.

Table 4: Updated Big Ten win distribution matrix after Week Six

The Spartan's expected win total got another boost following the Rutgers beatdown this week. It is now up to a value of 9.48 wins. In other words, I now give MSU a 50-50 chance to get to double digit wins, which would give the Spartans a very nice bowl bid indeed, and possibly one in the New Year's Six.

An 11-1 record for MSU now has odds of 17 percent and the odds of running the table are up over five percent. All I will say is that is simply incredible based on where we were just two months ago.

A closer look at MSU's remaining schedule

Figure 2 below gives my updated projections for the Vegas lines and win probabilities for all of the games remaining on MSU's schedule. These numbers are generated based on the results of the full season Monte Carlo simulation.

Figure 2: Updates projections for the Vegas line and win probabilities for MSU's remaining schedule

Up next for MSU is next week's game at Indiana. As we can see, my computer shows MSU as a comfortable two-touchdown favorite. However, the actual line opened on Sunday afternoon with MSU only favored by three.

As for the remaining games, I now project MSU to be a comfortable favorite at Purdue and versus Maryland. My projected line for the home games against Michigan and Penn State is close to a touchdown, while my projected line for the game at Ohio State is closer to a field goal.

Some or most of these lines may look off, but I honestly speaking, I think that they make sense based on the actual on-field results so far. Keep in mind that MSU has beaten five of its six opponents by at least 17 points, including three road wins over Power Five teams.

I have seen nothing so far this year to convince me that Indiana or Maryland is significantly better than Northwestern, Miami, or Western Kentucky. Furthermore, Purdue is likely on par with Rutgers. Therefore, all of those lines make sense to me.

As for the lines for the Penn State, Michigan, and Ohio State games, I know that it looks weird that MSU would be a bigger underdog at home versus the Lions and Wolverines than on the road in Columbus. 

But, Ohio State did not look good at all against Oregon or Tulsa. Those results still matter and the computer takes those into account. Yes, Ohio State has looked much better over the last three weeks. I fully expect that line will be higher than any other line on MSU's remaining schedule. But... if you were to put Iowa jerseys on those Ohio State players and tell me the result of each game... I would think that the line in Figure 2 looks about right.

National Overview

Finally, let's take a quick look around the country at the rest of the action. Once again, the updated conference odds can be viewed by clicking on the hyperlink attached to each conference name. 

The most impactful result of the entire weekend was Texas A&M's upset win over Alabama in SEC action. Now, there are four teams in the SEC West with a single conference loss, and the race all of a sudden has gotten interesting. Alabama has already beat one of those four teams (Ole Miss) but they must face the other two on the road (Mississippi State and Auburn). 

My computer still gives the Crimson Tide the edge in division odds (45 percent), but Auburn (18 percent), Ole Miss (16 percent), Mississippi State (nine percent), and even Arkansas (7.5 percent) are all within shouting distance.

Meanwhile, in the SEC East, Georgia has now officially ascended to the No. 1 spot in the AP and Coaches Poll (as well as in my power rankings). The Bulldogs odds to win the East remain very high (93 percent) with 6-0 Kentucky (five percent) as the only team that seems to have even a remote shot to leap frogger Georgia and steal the Division crown.

With only three Big 12 games on the slate this week, there was not too much movement in the overall conference race. That said, Oklahoma's stunning come-from-behind win over Texas in the red river raid showdown helped their case, or least prevented disaster. Overall, my computer still felt the Sooners (47 percent odds to play in the Big 12 Championship Game) should have done better, and thus Oklahoma State captured the top odds at 51 percent. Iowa State's odds ticked up slightly to 41 percent, while Baylor's 25-point win over West Virginia goosed their odds up to 36 percent.

The ACC continues to be an adventure. Wake Forest avoided a bad upset at Syracuse in overtime and continues to have the best odds to win the Atlantic Division at 68 percent. Pitt maintained the best odds in the Coastal (63 percent) by just staying home and playing video games this weekend. 

Elsewhere, Florida State upset North Carolina, and Virginia edged Louisville to stay afloat in the Coastal race. Virginia Tech was not so fortunate versus Notre Dame, but I still give the Hokies the second best Coastal Division odds at 28 percent.

Out west in Pac Man-12 action, Oregon State started the week at the top of my Pac-12 North leaderboard, but, alas, the Beavers lost to Washington State, which give the keys to the North back to mostly likely Oregon (35 percent) or maybe Washington (26 percent). 

In the Pac-12 South, Arizona State (54 percent) handled Stanford this week to stay at the top of the odds table while Utah made a big jump up to 37 percent and second place after upsetting USC.

My computer's playoff leaderboard has Georgia in the top spot with over a 90 percent chance to earn one of the top four spots. Michigan (47 percent), Iowa (47 percent) are essentially tied for second, while interestingly I project Notre Dame (34 percent) with the fourth best odds. Rounding out the top 10 are Wake Forest, Penn State, Cincinnati, Oklahoma State, Pitt, and Oklahoma.

In notable Group of Five action, Cincinnati and Coastal Carolina both won big and covered. Those two teams have the top two spots in my Group of Five leaderboard locked down with 66 percent and 10 percent odds to capture a New Years' Six slot respectively. 

In other American Athletic Conference action, Houston covered easily against Tulane and seem to be the biggest potential threat to Cincinnati. Those two teams do not meet in the regular season, but now favored to meet in the AAC Championship game.

In the Mountain West, Boise State had an upset win over BYU and are once again favored to win the Mountain Division (33 percent) while San Diego State (44 percent) made a move in the West race in the eyes of my computer.

In the MAC, the biggest story was Western Michigan's surprising blow out loss to Ball State. As a result, I now Northern Illinois (43 percent) favored to win the MAC West and Miami of Ohio (53 percent) favored in the East, despite their loss to Eastern Michigan this weekend.

In Conference USA, Marshall (45 percent) is still likely to face UAB (44 percent) in the conference final. Finally, in Sun Belt action, Coastal Carolina's two biggest challengers, Appalachian State and Louisiana both had byes this week.

Against all odds, I have made it to the end. Until next time, enjoy and Go State, beat Hoosiers!

See the additional data tables below













Comments

Popular posts from this blog

March Madness Analysis: Did the Selection Committee Get it Right in 2025?

I will be assembling my "usual" stats-based analysis of the bracket, complete with picks a little later this week (but before Thursday). For now, I had some thought on the bracket. In general, MSU's draw is about as good as fans could expect. I will go into more detail on that later. As for the job that the committee did... I am far from impressed. Once again, there are multiple errors in team selection, seeding, and bracketing as a whole. Let's look at each one in turn. Did the Committee get the right 68 teams? More or less. This is the area where I am the least concerned. As I mentioned yesterday, my metrics had UNC safely in the field and not even in the First Four, but I swapped them out for WVU at the last minute. UNC's single Q1 win gave me too much pause. I felt slightly vindicated when UNC made it.  My biggest beef is with Texas making it in at 19-15. That's just too many loses. Yes, they had 7 Q1 wins, but that also had 5 loses outside of Q1 and an ov...

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2025 Edition)

For my money, we are all of the cusp of the best three weeks of the entire year. We just wrapped up two weeks of conference tournaments, but those were just an appetizer to the main course that is yet to come.  The powers that be gave us the menu on Sunday evening for the feast that is to come. Now it is time to enjoy a brief break and palette cleaner before we all make our selections. But what shall we choose? Which tasty little upset looks the best in the first round? Which teams are most likely to be sweet in the second weekend? Which quartet will comprise the final course? Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title. There is no foolproof way to dominate your...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...