Skip to main content

March Madness Metrics: Counting Wins

The 2022 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament wrapped up on April 4 with the Kansas Jayhawks defeating North Carolina to claim the school's fourth National Title and the second crystal basketball for head coach Bill Self. Meanwhile, No. 7 seed Michigan State advanced to the second round of the Tournament by beating No. 10 seed Davidson before succumbing to eventual Final Four participant, No. 2 seed Duke.

For hall-of-fame head coach Tom Izzo, it was his 24th consecutive NCAA Tournament. Michigan State fans know that Coach Izzo is one of the best college basketball coaches of all time. When the calendar turns to April, it is a good time to reflect back on the recently complete season and tournament to best understand exactly how lucky Spartan fans are to have Coach Izzo on the bench in East Lansing.

In any sport, there are countless ways to quantity success or failure. Simple wins and loses is perhaps the most straightforward way. This is true for the NCAA basketball tournament as well. In addition, it is also reasonable to examine how far a coach advances in the tournament. Today, we will review both metrics following the 2022 Tournament.

Overall Wins

Table 1 below gives a summary of overall wins and losses for a selection of 30 of the best NCAA Tournament coaches of the modern era. The "modern era" refers to the time period starting from 1979 when the tournament expanded to 40 teams and all teams were seeded. Table 1 generally includes all active coaches with at least 15 NCAA Tournament wins as well as all inactive coaches with at least 30 wins. Notable former Big Ten coaches John Beilein (Michigan) and Bo Ryan (Wisconsin) were also included as references.

Table 1: Summary of overall NCAA Tournament wins for a list of 30 notable coaches in the post-1979 era.

When it comes to overall wins in the modern era, Coach Izzo currently ranks No. 7 with a total of 53 wins. Now retired Duke head coach Mike Krzyzewski finished his career with 101 wins which is a record that most likely will not be broken any time soon. In second place is former Kansas and North Carolina coach Roy Williams, who retired in 2021 with 79 career NCAA Tournament wins.

In third place overall is current Syracuse head coach Jim Boeheim with 61 total wins. At 77 years old, Boeheim is not likely to add a significant number of wins to that total in however many years he decides to continue coaching.

Behind Boeheim is a cluster of active coaches with very similar tournament resumes. John Calipari of Kentucky currently checks in with 56 total Tournament wins. Bill Self of Kansas has 55 wins, Rick Pitino (now at Iona) has 54, and Michigan State's Tom Izzo has 53. It is notable that these four coaches now have more wins (in the modern era) than several legends including Jim Calhoun (UCONN), Dean Smith (North Carolina), and Lute Olsen (Arizona).

With Rick Pitino likely to retire at Iona in the next few years, Coach Izzo is very likely to pass the former Kentucky and Louisville coach in these standings. However, As Izzo (age 67) is older than both John Calipari (63) and Bill Self (59), it is going to be challenging to catch and/or stay ahead of either. 

That said, Table 1 is counting wins that have been vacated by the NCAA. The "official" record shows Jim Boeheim with four fewer wins and Calipari with 10 fewer wins. The NCAA has also been swirling around Kansas for years. When all the dust settles, Coach Izzo could finish his career as high as third place in the official record books in total wins since 1979. In any event, Coach Izzo will certainly remain in the top 10 for the foreseeable future.

The main reason for this is that Coach Izzo has a sizable lead in wins over the next grouping of active coaches. Mark Few of Gonzaga is currently in sixth place in wins among active coaches with 38. Jay Wright (Villanova) and Bob Huggins (West Virginia) are tied for seventh place with 34 wins, and the next coach on the list of Rick Barnes of Tennessee with 25 wins. None of these coaches are likely to catch Izzo.

Win Percentage

While the win count is a great metric, it does give an advantage to coaches with very long tenures. Naturally, coaches tend to only have long tenures when they win consistently in March. But, looking at the NCAA Tournament win percentage gives a little more information about the success of each coach.

Tom Izzo's current winning percentage of 0.697 (53-23) is ranked No. 23 all-time in the modern era. That said, seven of the coaches ahead of Izzo on this list have coached in three or fewer tournaments.  Maintaining an NCAA Tournament winning percentage above 0.700 over a long period of time is very difficult. A coach would need to average a bit better than a Sweet 16 appearance every year to surpass this value.

Within the group of active coaches who have appeared in more than two tournaments, Coach Izzo's win percentage is currently ranked No. 4 behind only John Calipari, Rick Pitino, and Bill Self. Overall, Coach K's final winning percentage of 0.765 in 132 total games is the highest of any coach with more than eight total tournament game appearances. This value will likely be the benchmark for many years to come. 

Favorites versus Underdogs

Recently retired Duke Head Coach Mike Krzyzewski's final record and winning percentage is obviously very impressive. However, the right side of Table 1 provides a bit more context to those numbers. While all wins and loses count, it is a bit easier to rack up wins as a No. 1 or a No. 2 seed, which has been the case 26 times in Coach K's career.

While there are several ways to measure performance in the NCAA Tournament against the expectation of a given seed, the easiest thing to measure is simply a coach's record as either the favorite or the underdog in any given Tournament match-ups. The right side of Table 1 provides this data.

Somewhat shockingly, Coach K was only the seed-based underdog 13 times in his entire career as Duke's head coach. Duke won only five of those games, the last upset win occurring in 1994 (against No. 1 seed Purdue). 

By contrast, Michigan State's Tom Izzo has played in 27 of his total 76 NCAA Tournament games as the underdog, and Coach Izzo has won 15 of those 30 games (56 percent). As Table 1 shows, these total wins as the underdog is tied with Jim Boeheim for the most all time. In fact, former Arizona coach Lute Olson is the only other coach in history with more than 10 upset wins. But both Boeheim and Olson are at or below 0.500 overall as underdogs.

But it is not like Tom Izzo doesn't win as the favorite in March. Coach Izzo's 82.6 percent winning rate as the favorite is still good for seventh place in Table 1 and eighth place all-time among coaches who have played at least 10 tournament games as the higher seed. Coach Izzo is unique in his ability to win both as a favorite and as the underdog at a high level. He is the only coach in history who has won over 80 percent of his Tournament games as the favorite and over 55 percent of his games as the underdog with more than eight total Tournament games played.

Round-By-Round Performance

Coaches that tend to win more NCAA Tournament games naturally tend to advance farther into the tournament. Table 2 below digs into this aspect of tournament performance in more detail for the same group of 30 coaches highlighted above. Similar to Table 1, particularly good or poor performance in each category is shaded in either green or in orange. Similar to Table 1, particularly good or poor performance in each category is shaded in either green or in orange. 
Table 2: Round-by-round performance of 30 notable college basketball coaches, including both the raw number of appearance and the rate advancing to each round. The winning percentage on the first and second day of a given weekend is also summarized.

The first column of note summarizes the number of times (and rate) that each of the 30 notable coaches has been upset in the first round of the Tournament by a lower seed. As we can see, almost every coach on the list has been bounced from the Tournament on the first day by an underdog at least once. Only Dean Smith, Jay Wright, and Bruce Pearl (at Tennessee and Auburn) have avoided this fate.

Several coaches have only suffered one first round upset in their careers. This list includes Roy Williams, Rick Pitino, Jim Calhoun, Georgetown great John Thompson, Bo Ryan, and John Beilein (on slightly lower volume). 

As for Tom Izzo, his three upset losses in the first round (to No. 10 seed Nevada in 2004, No. 11 George Mason in 2006 and No. 15 Middle Tennessee State in 2016) is slightly higher than several other coaches. But, the rate of just 16 percent is certainly reasonable.

Advancing to the Sweet 16 is also a notable accomplishment, or so I am told. Tom Izzo has been to a total of 14 Sweet 16s in his career, which is tied with Bill Self for sixth all-time in the post-1979 era. To put this number into context, Coach Izzo personally has more Sweet 16 appearances than every Big Ten program except for Indiana (which also has 14). Coach Izzo's has advanced to the Sweet 16 in close to 60 percent of every Tournament that he has appeared in, which is competitive with the top coaches on the board in Table 2.

Coach Izzo's 10 Regional Final (Elite Eight) appearances are also tied for sixth place in the modern era with Dean Smith. Once again, this number is greater than any other Big Ten school back to 1979, and Coach Izzo's 42 percent rate is also impressive.

It should come as no surprise that advancing to the Final Four is one area where Coach Izzo stands out. Izzo's eight total Final Fours put him in third place in the modern era behind only Mike Krzyzewski (13) and Roy Williams (nine). Coach Izzo is at the top of this list among active coaches, as his is 33 percent rate among coaches with more than two tournaments appearance.

That said, Coach Izzo's lone National Title in 24 tournaments (four percent rate) is a tad low. There are several coaches on the list with a championship rate closer to or over 10 percent. That said, in the modern era, only ten total coaches have won more than one National Title. Hopefully, Coach Izzo will be able to join that list before he retires.

Finally, the rightmost two columns in Table 2 summarize the winning percentage that all 30 coaches have broken down by the first day and the second day of the weekend. Anecdotally, Coach Izzo is thought to be very strong on the second game on the weekend (the second round, Elite 8 round, and the National Title game). The data suggests that this is correct.

Of the 30 coaches listed in Table 2, only seven have a winning percent over 70 on the second game of the given weekend. Coach Tom Izzo is now second all-time in this metric of coaches with more than 12 NCAA Tournament wins. Only Louisville legend Denny Crum, with an 82 percent rate, was better. Even considering Michigan State's second round loss to Duke in 2022, Coach Izzo still appears to be the master of the two-day-turnaround.

Counting wins and round-by-round performance is a great place to start in the analysis of NCAA Tournament performance. But, not all NCAA paths are created equally. Next time, we will dig into more advanced March Madness Metrics will look at performance relative to expectation. Stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2024 Edition)

For as long as I can remember, I have loved the NCAA Basketball Tournament. I love the bracket. I love the underdogs. I love One Shining Moment. I even love the CBS theme music. As a kid I filled out hand-drawn brackets and scoured the morning newspaper for results of late night games. As I got older, I started tracking scores using a increasing complex set of spreadsheets. Over time, as my analysis became more sophisticated, I began to notice certain patterns to the Madness I have found that I can use modern analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the tournament itself and perhaps even extract some hints as to how the tournament might play out. Last year, I used this analysis to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title in addition to other notable upsets. There is no foolproof way to dominate your office pool, but it is possible to spot upsets that are more likely than others and teams that are likely to go on a run or flame out early.

The Case for Optimism

In my experience there are two kinds of Michigan State fans. First, there are the pessimists. These are the members of the Spartan fan base who always expect the worst. Any amount of success for the Green and White is viewed to be a temporary spat of good luck. Even in the years when Dantonio was winning the Rose Bowl and Izzo was going to the Final Four, dark times were always just around the bend. Then, there are the eternal optimists. This part of the Spartan fan base always bets on the "over." These fans expect to go to, and win, and bowl games every year. They expect that the Spartans can win or least be competitive in every game on the schedule. The optimists believe that Michigan State can be the best Big Ten athletic department in the state. When it comes to the 2023 Michigan State football team, the pessimists are having a field day. A major scandal, a fired head coach, a rash of decommitments, and a four-game losing streak will do that. Less than 24 months after hoi

2023 Final Playoff and New Year's Six Predictions

The conference championships have all been played and, in all honesty, last night's results were the absolute worst-case scenario for the Selection Committee. Michigan and Washington will almost certainly be given the No. 1 and No. 2 seed and be placed in the Sugar Bowl and the Rose Bowl respectively. But there are four other teams with a reasonable claim on the last two spots and I have no idea what the committee is going to do. Florida State is undefeated, but the Seminoles played the weakest schedule of the four candidates and their star quarterbac (Jordan Travis) suffered a season ending injury in the second-to-last game of the regular season. Florida State is outside of the Top 10 in both the FPI and in my power rankings. I also the Seminoles ranked No. 5 in my strength of record metric, behind two of the other three candidates. Georgia is the defending national champions and were previously ranked No. 1 coming into the week. But after losing to Alabama in the SEC Title game,