Skip to main content

Elilte Eights are nice and all, but Tom Izzo and the Spartans want more

This is not Michigan State head coach Tom Izzo's first rodeo. It is in fact, his 27th rodeo in his 30th season at the helm in East Lansing. He has been in this position before, and it takes a little more than just a win in the Sweet 16, his 11th, to get him excited.

"Elite Eights are great, but we don't put up any banners for Great Eights," Izzo said when asked about the magnitude of Michigan State's 73-70 win over Mississippi in Friday night's NCAA Tournament contest in the South Region Semifinals. "We put up banners for championships, and Final Fours, and national championships."

In other words, Izzo is not done yet this year. On some level, he is just getting started. As a No. 2 seed in the NCAA Tournament, Michigan State was basically expected the reach the Regional Final. That mission has been accomplished. When it comes to performance against seed expectation, Izzo is the best of all time. 

But Izzo and the Spartans want more, and it's the next game where things start to get real.

"It's hard to believe that in two days we're playing for a chance to do one of the all time great things in any basketball player's life: to play for a Final Four," he said. "I'm proud and happy for them (the players). They've earned it. They deserved it. They did it."

This type of statement is standard procedure for Izzo. Despite the fact he is one of the greatest college basketball coaches of all time, he is quick to credit his players and those around him. It's not about him. He never makes it about him. He always makes it about "us." 

Friday night in Atlanta was no different. When asked later about the gravity of his team's accomplishments, he eventually allowed himself to be a bit more retrospective, but not for long.

"Sometimes it's surreal," Izzo said. "I think of some of the guys that that I've idolized in coaching who have never been to one (Elite Eight). I'm just so pleased, but I'm so humbled by it, because there's so many good players, and my staff did a hell of a job.

"They say it's everybody's got to be involved," he continued. "We talked about our team being 'strengthen numbers', but our staff, our managers, our scout team, we've had most strength of numbers as we've ever had here. To get to an Elite Eight with a team that we all know isn't quite as talented as some as I've had shows you how important connectivity is. It shows you how important togetherness is. It shows you how important pulling from one another is, and that's what makes this so cool."

[Insert photo]

But earning the victory in the Sweet 16 was far from easy. Despite being a solid favorite over the scrappy, well-coached team from Mississippi, the Spartans found themselves with yet another slow start. This time, it was almost the Spartans' undoing.

Michigan State trailed the entire first half of the contest. The Spartans' first lead of the game came with less than eight minutes on the clock. Michigan State did not claim the lead for good until the final four minutes.

"That team (Ole Miss) was the toughest, most physical defensive team that we played in years," Izzo said. "It reminded me of the old Gene Keady (former Purdue coach) or Clem Haskins (former Minnesota coach) teams when I started in this profession, and they did a good job... we weren't the toughest team tonight, and it pains me to say that."

When asked about what was going wrong in the first half and what the conversations were like in the huddles, Izzo was direct in what went on.

"I asked them what the hell they're doing," he said. "We were not guarding. We were not doing a very good job offensively. They (Ole Miss) had slips (to the basket). The real killer was the turnovers. We had turnovers, and they were kind of ridiculous.

"We gave up a missed cut off free throw," he continued. "We gave up out of bounds plays. They're supposed to be a poor rebounding team and they kicked our butts. They had 12 offensive rebounds to our five. So you know what you should do is give them a lot of credit, and yet give us a lot of credit for bouncing back in the second half."

Izzo's players did not disagree with their coach's assessment. In fact, freshman guard Jase Richardson, who led the Spartans in scoring with 20 points, agreed almost completely.

"For us in the first half we were not being as aggressive as we should have been," Richardson said. "I feel like they (Ole Miss) were kind of just punking us in the beginning,. We couldn't get to the paint. We were shooting decent shots, but not great shots. I think second half that really opened up for us. We were being more aggressive, getting downhill, and getting driving kicks. So I felt like we were at our best in the second half."

But as the second half came to a close, as the story has gone all season, Michigan State was the stronger team in winning time. Perhaps Ole Miss got a little tired and a little worn down. Perhaps Michigan State just figured it out. Either way, they found a way to survive and advance.

"We got stymie a lot," Izzo said.  "I love these guys because they keep grinding.

"We did a poor job of just moving the ball the first half," he continued. "In the second half, we decided to drive it more. We blurred more screens. We got downhill. We got both to the free throw line and to the basket and shot a higher percentage. Then defensively, we decided to start guarding a little bit better."

[Insert Photo]

Now, the Spartans move on to Coach Izzo's 11th Regional Final, a round where he is 8-2 all time. That 80% success rate in the fourth round of the NCAA Tournament is the best of any coach with more than three appearances.

Michigan State will face, on paper, the top No. 1 seed in the bracket, the Auburn Tigers, who ended the Michigan Wolverine's season a few hours after the Spartans outlasted the Rebels. 

Izzo will be looking for his sixth win over a No. 1 seed. Only former Duke coach Mike Krzyewski (eight), former Arizona coach Lute Olson (seven), and former Kansas and North Carolina Coach Roy Williams (six) can equal that tally. Izzo will also have a chance to add to his already best all-time record of 17 NCAA Tournament wins as the lower seed. 

In order to get the win on Sunday and to advance to Izzo's ninth Final Four (which would tie Roy Williams for second place in the post-1978 modern era of seeded tournaments), the Spartans will need to shore things up on several fronts.

"I'm just so happy and proud, but we're not playing great," Izzo said. "We're still growing. We're still learning. I feel we can still get better, and they (the players) think that they need to get better, so we're going to coach them tonight, tomorrow morning, and tomorrow afternoon... We're not a team that can just go out and play and win."

Izzo is a legend for many reasons, but one of the most important is his ability to prepare his teams for the second game of the weekend in the NCAA Tournament. Under Izzo, the Spartans are 25-8 (75.8%) after a one-day prep in Tournament play. 

Only Krzyewski (75.9%) and former Louisville coach Denny Crumb (82%) have a higher percentage in more than seven attempts. Coach Izzo would surpass Coach K's percentage with a win over Auburn.

If the words of senior guard Jaden Akins are any indications, the Spartans will be ready on Sunday.

"We've got the best coaching staff in the country," Akins said. "I feel like they are going to have us ready to play. And we're gonna do a lot of walk throughs, get ready for whoever we're gonna play. I'm just gonna tell the guys to go out there and play with no fear, and we're not gonna have no regrets. We're gonna play as hard as we can."

Michigan State takes on Auburn on Sunday afternoon at 5:05 p.m. with a bid to the Final Four on the line. The game will be broadcast on CBS.

For Michigan State's Tom Izzo, "strength in numbers" means connectivity, togetherness, and pulling for one another.

"That's what makes this so cool."

On Sunday it might mean a ninth trip to the Final Four.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

March Madness Analysis: Did the Selection Committee Get it Right in 2025?

I will be assembling my "usual" stats-based analysis of the bracket, complete with picks a little later this week (but before Thursday). For now, I had some thought on the bracket. In general, MSU's draw is about as good as fans could expect. I will go into more detail on that later. As for the job that the committee did... I am far from impressed. Once again, there are multiple errors in team selection, seeding, and bracketing as a whole. Let's look at each one in turn. Did the Committee get the right 68 teams? More or less. This is the area where I am the least concerned. As I mentioned yesterday, my metrics had UNC safely in the field and not even in the First Four, but I swapped them out for WVU at the last minute. UNC's single Q1 win gave me too much pause. I felt slightly vindicated when UNC made it.  My biggest beef is with Texas making it in at 19-15. That's just too many loses. Yes, they had 7 Q1 wins, but that also had 5 loses outside of Q1 and an ov...

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2025 Edition)

For my money, we are all of the cusp of the best three weeks of the entire year. We just wrapped up two weeks of conference tournaments, but those were just an appetizer to the main course that is yet to come.  The powers that be gave us the menu on Sunday evening for the feast that is to come. Now it is time to enjoy a brief break and palette cleaner before we all make our selections. But what shall we choose? Which tasty little upset looks the best in the first round? Which teams are most likely to be sweet in the second weekend? Which quartet will comprise the final course? Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title. There is no foolproof way to dominate your...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...