In 1912, British philosopher and mathematician Bertrand Russell introduced the world to a story about a turkey.
The turkey in question was fed and cared for every day. Each day, he would stick his head through a hole and on the other side he would received a veritable feast, at least from the perspective of a bird. Summer turned slowly into fall and the turkey grew steadily larger and stronger. It was a good life for the turkey and he saw no end in sight to his good fortune.
But one day in late November, something different happened. When our plucky protagonist stuck his head through the hole, instead of a hearty mean he instead met his fate by the means of a very sharp knife. A little while later, he was the guest of honor at the farmer's Thanksgiving feast.
This classic allegory is meant to illustrate the dangers of inductive reasoning. In other words, just because a certain trend has happened in the past does not mean that it will continue indefinitely. One has to dig deeper to understand the full picture. In this case, the turkey did not understand the true motivation of the farmer, which led to an inaccurate assumption about the future.
In this final weekend of the regular season, there were several practical examples of this so-called "turkey illusion."
For example, there were several turkeys who root for a certain school down the road who seemed to believe that just because their team had beaten their rivals four straight times, that trend was going to continue. This belief was held despite the broader view that the team was a double-digit underdog to the defending National Champions and perhaps the team in question had benefited during the winning streak due to an illegal sign stealing scheme.
Closer to home, some Spartans fans likely believed that because the Michigan State football team had lost eight games in a row that they would lose the final game of the season to Maryland. This belief was held despite the boarder view that the Spartans had been playing much better football over the past few weeks and (most importantly) had continue to play hard, fight, and compete in every game.
Both trends came to an abrupt end on Saturday. Most notably, Michigan State was able to stave off a second half surge from the Maryland Terrapins and scored a late touchdown on fourth down to secure the Spartans' first Big Ten win of the season.
A potential third variation of the turkey illusion may have also been in play on Sunday. This version said that because Jonathan Smith was not able to produce a winning season in either of his first two years that he was not a good fit for the head coaching position at Michigan State. The theory in this example is that Smith was never going to work out in East Lansing.
Illusions or not, we will never get a chance to learn whether Smith could have turned the Spartans around. On Sunday, the ax fell on Smith and his staff. On Monday afternoon, former Northwestern Coach Pat Fitzgerald was named as the next head coach of the Spartans.
I went on record last week with my support in Jonathan Smith getting another year in East Lansing. I still believe that was the best course of action. But, I also did not have all the facts or the broader perspective that Michigan State athletic director J Batt has. For this reason, I will reserve judgment on his decision.
I have always respected Fitzgerald as a coach and as a leader. He always fielded tough and competitive teams at a place with limited resources and recruiting pull. Fitzgerald seems to share a lot of personality traits with former Spartan coach Mark Dantonio. That is going to play well in East Lansing.
That said, his record in his final few years in Evanston were not spectacular. His Wildcats went just 1-8 in Big Ten play in three of his final four years. More concerning, he was fired from Northwestern due to a disgraceful scandal and has been out of coaching for the last three years as a result. This certainly calls into question my previous statement about his leadership abilities.
But for better or for worse, Pat Fitzgerald is now the 27th coach of the Michigan State Spartans. Maybe the next few years will result in a bounteous future for Michigan State football. Or maybe the Spartans are simply getting Northwestern's cold Thanksgiving leftovers. Only time will tell.
Week 14 Betting Results
Let's take a look at the performance of last week's picks from my Bad Betting Advice article, starting with the overview summary shown below in Figure 1. More information about how to read this figure can be found in the Week One edition of Against All Odds.
![]() |
| Figure 1: Results of Week 14 showing the actual point differentials relative to the opening spread. |
A total of 19 teams overachieved in Week 14 by beating the spread by more than 14 points including Indiana, Texas Tech, James Madison, South Florida, Louisville, East Carolina, Miami, Iowa, TCU, Florida, and Arizona. No team this week failed to beat the spread by 14 points, yet still won.
There were a total of 16 upsets in Week 12, which was a little below the expected value of 18.8 from my weekly simulation. Table 1 below summarizes those upsets and compares them to the picks made last week.
![]() |
| Table 1: Upsets in Week 14 based on the opening Vegas line compared to the upset projections from last week. |
This week's biggest upset based on the opening spread was California over SMU (-11.5) which cost the Mustangs a shot at both the ACC Title and a potential playoff berth. Other notable upsets include Navy over Memphis (-6), Houston over Baylor (-3), Vanderbilt over Tennessee (-3), Clemson over South Carolina (-1.5), and New Mexico over San Diego State (-1.5).
My computer went 3-5 (37.5%) on upset picks which brings the year-to-date performance to 43-53 (45%). This is a solid performance and well above my benchmark target of 40%. But, it is not quite as good as the 2023 season (49%) or the 2024 season (51%).
The FPI went 4-5 (44%) this week which brings the year-to-date total to 24-35 (41%). This performance is also above expectations, but not as good as the last two years (44% and 47%).
There were no recommended picks against the spread by either computer this week. For the full slate of games, my algorithm went 36-31 (54%). The year-to-date performance on suggested bets remains at 32-29 (53%) and 381-371 (51%) overall.
My FPI-based suggested bets finish the regular season at 20-16 (56%). The full set of FPI picks went 29-38 (43%) this week. This brings the overall year-to-date performance for the FPI to 355-397 (47%), which is significantly worse than my algorithm.
Table 3 below gives the results of the point total bets for Week 14.
![]() |
| Table 3: Results of the recommended point total bets ("over/under") for Week 14. |
My point total bets have been a real turkey for most of the year, but they finished the regular season strong. All three picks were correct, two of which were locks. This brings the year-to-date totals to 26-31 (46%) for the locks and 82-89 (48%) for the full set of suggested bets.



Comments
Post a Comment