Skip to main content

Where will MSU wind up on Selection Sunday?

With the Big Ten Tournament now in the rear view mirror, having ending with what is obviously the worst case scenario for MSU, the Big Ten, the state of Michigan, the USA, planet Earth, and likely the multiverse, it is time to sit and wait (un)patiently for Selection Sunday on March 11th when the official NCAA tournament bracket is announced.  In the mean time, how will this weekend's event impact MSU? Will they still be able to play their first round games in Detroit? Well, let's take a look at some hard numbers and see what we can learn.

One of the best resources out there is the Bracket Matrix website which this morning was updated to reflect yesterday's action in the majority of the brackets that they track. MSU has slipped to the "best" 3-seed (#9 overall), while UofM is the weakest 3-seed (#12 overall). This seems in line with ESPN's bracket this morning. But I did some initial analysis on the data set.

MSU is listed as a 2-seed in 37 of the brackets (47%)
MSU is listed as a 3-seed in 39 of the brackets (49%)
MSU is listed as a 4-seed in 4 of the brackets (7%)

UofM is listed as a 2-seed in 4 of the brackets (5%)
UofM is listed as a 3-seed in 39 of the brackets (49%)
UofM is listed as a 4-seed in 32 of the brackets (43%)

Also,

MSU and UofM have the same seed in 25 of the brackets (32%)
MSU has a better seed than UofM in 52 of the brackets (66%)
UofM has a better seed than MSU in 2 of the brackets (3%)

Considering both teams are "in the clubhouse" it seems quite unlikely that UofM will jump MSU on the S curve and "steal" the last slot in Detroit, but not impossible.

That said, it is important to looks at the other teams near MSU on the S-curve. Based on my experience as a "bracketologist" I strongly believe that as long as MSU is in the Top 8 of the teams roughly east of the Mississippi, we will still be in Detroit, unless the committee breaks with precedent. Right now, MSU is right at #8 (as #4 Kansas does not count).  Teams #1 through #5 are essentially out of reach, but the others bear mentioning.

#6 Purdue -- MSU beat Purdue in their only meeting, finished ahead of Purdue in the regular season standings, is ranked higher in both human polls, and honestly played Michigan closer in the BTT. Could MSU actually wind up above Purdue on the Final S curve? Most expert seem to think "no," but I think it is at least possible.

#7 UNC -- MSU did beat them head-to-head. If UNC flames out early in the ACC tournament with 10 total losses, MSU might just wind up ahead of them as well. Unlikely, but possible.

#8 Cincinnati -- The Bearcats were the team that in principle has knocked MSU off the 2-line. If Cinci would have lost to Wichita State this Sunday, MSU's odds to stay in Detroit would have been much, much higher. Now, it is a bit of a toss up. An early flame out in the AAC tournament would be helpful.

#9 MSU

#10 Auburn -- They will get sent to Dallas, so they don't matter

#11 Tennessee -- This is the team that poses the most risk to MSU, for two reasons. First, they are a natural fit for the Nashville pod, just as MSU is a natural fit for the Detroit pod. So, there will be a push to keep the Vols there as opposed to sending Cincinnati there. Second, they are the only team still playing on the 1-4 line that can really put enough pressure on MSU from the bottom to knock us out of Detroit. Root for the Vols to make an early exit from the SEC tournament, or at the very least pray they don't beat Auburn if the play each other.

#12 Michigan -- covered above.  The consensus of the experts suggest that did not over take MSU this weekend.

Possible wildcards:

#16 West Virginia -- If they win the Big 12 tournament, they might be a threat, but I doubt it.
#17 Clemson -- If they win the ACC tournament, they might be a threat, but I doubt it.

So, that is how I see it. But, I do not have faith in the committee to actually use rational judgement. For all I know, they have Michigan as a 2-seed in the Detroit pod and MSU as a 4-seed in Boise. That is unlikely, but after their initial bracket a few weeks ago, I cannot rule it out.  At the end of the day, the committee is going to put out a bracket, and anyone who thinks that they know who will go where is flat out wrong.  No one knows for sure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2026 Edition)

In my opinion, the middle of March is the absolute best time of the year. Over the past two weeks we have witnessed the exciting conclusion of several regular season conference races, followed by 31 conference tournaments. This past weekend, the full 68-team NCAA Tournament bracket was released. Sports fanatics are on the brink of Madness. Who will play the role of Cinderella in the story of the 2026 tournament? Will any survive to reach the second weekend? Which four teams will advance to Indianapolis on that first weekend in April? Which lucky team will end up cutting down the nets?  Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn would win the National Title. There is no foolproof way t...

After a strong swing through the state of Indiana, March beckons for Michigan State basketball

I have a bit of a confession to make. Back in December when I was reviewing the overall Big Ten schedule for the Michigan State Spartans, I noticed the back-to-back games at Purdue and at Indiana at the tail end of the conference campaign.  The games were spaced just three days apart, and the Spartan have struggled noticeably in both buildings historically. Outside of possibly the west coast trip in January, this two-game stretch looked like the most subtly challenge portion of the entire schedule. I believed that just getting a split in two games would be a success But the Spartans surprised both me and the college basketball world be rising to the challenge and winning both games. Other Big Ten teams were not as fortunate this weekend as both Purdue and Illinois picked up an additional loss. Table 1 below shows the updated enhanced Big Ten standings following the weekend's action. Table 1 : Enhanced Big Ten standing as of March 2. Michigan's win over Illinois on Friday night ...