Skip to main content

B1G Hoops Projections for 01/06/2020 (Post-UofM)

We are only 6 days into the new decade and it has already been a very positive year for MSU hoops.  The Spartans got two big wins since the calendar rolled over against Kenpom Top 40 teams.  Furthermore, two of MSU's potential title rivals (Purdue and Ohio State) both took an additional "L" in 2020 so far.  This is particularly significant since my preseason analysis suggested that those two teams (Purdue in particular) had a slight schedule advantage.  

But, how do the event impact the overall Big Ten race, numerically?   The following table gives the update Big Ten w:ins matrix and expected win totals after Sunday's action, using the updated Kenpom efficiency data:


For a more visual representation, here are the trends in expected wins back to the beginning of Big Ten play:




Amazingly, this analysis suggests that MSU has a 2.2 game lead in expected wins after only 4 games played.  That is absolutely huge.  For now, Ohio State still looks to be the biggest threat, with Maryland just a hair behind.  Those two teams will face each other tomorrow night at Maryland, so there is a good chance that Maryland will seize control of 2nd place.  That is certainly the current trend. 

After those top three, there is a real log-jam in the middle of the conference with 9 teams all projected to win between 9 and 11 games.  So far, Penn State, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Michigan are all trending towards 11 wins, Purdue, Rutgers, and Illinois project to win 10, and Minnesota and Indiana look to win 9.  

Northwestern and Nebraska are currently quite a ways back and are only projected to win 4 games.

As for the odds to win the conference (at least tie for 1st place), those odds are shown here, with the trends below:


As expected based on the previous table, MSU has a big lead in the odds department and now has a 74% chance to hang another banner.  OSU and Maryland check in at 19% and 14%, while the rest of the conference is at 5% or below.

While MSU is currently sitting pretty at 4-0, I think that it is important not to get too excited.  The math does suggest that a record of 16-4 or so will be enough to win the conference.  In fact, there is only a 25% chance that any team finishes at 17-3 or better.  In other words, losses are coming.  If nothing else, MSU has gotten the luxury of playing 3 of the first 4 conference games at home, and the one road game was against one of the two worst teams in the league.  Home teams are still 20-3 so far in conference play.  There is going to be a rough patch or two in the next 8 weeks.  Don't freak out when it happens.  

Fortunately, Kenpom data can also help us rank the remaining games from hardest to easiest.  Based on the current data, that list looks like this (with the win probability in parentheses):
  1. @ Maryland (47%)
  2. @ Michigan (54%)
  3. @ Purdue (57%)
  4. @ Wisconsin (57%)
  5. @ Penn St. (58%)
  6. @ Illinois (62%)
  7. @ Minnesota (64%)
  8. vs. Ohio St. (64%)
  9. @ Indiana (65%)
  10. vs. Maryland (72%)
  11. vs. Iowa (78%)
  12. vs. Wisconsin (79%)
  13. vs. Penn St. (80%)
  14. vs. Minnesota (84%)
  15. @ Nebraska (92%)
  16. vs. Northwestern (95%)

The toughest 5 road games all have win probabilities between 47% and 60%.  MSU will likely win 2-3 of those games.  The next 5 games all have win probabilities between 60% and 75%.  MSU should win 3 of those games.  The final 6 games have win probabilities between 75% and 95%.  MSU should win 5-6 of those games.  For better or worse, of the toughest 5 games, only the game @ Purdue is coming up in the next few weeks.

For MSU to be a champion, they just need to finish ahead of the curve in those three groups.  In other words, win 3 (not 2) of the toughest 5, and lose no more than 2 games in the bottom 10.  That gets you to 16-4 and earns you a banner (most likely). That is more wins than MSU is currently expected to win, based on raw probability (15.2, in the original table), but championship teams need to win more toss-ups than they lose.

It's early, but things are looking good so far for MSU.  Go Green.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

March Madness Analysis: Did the Selection Committee Get it Right in 2025?

I will be assembling my "usual" stats-based analysis of the bracket, complete with picks a little later this week (but before Thursday). For now, I had some thought on the bracket. In general, MSU's draw is about as good as fans could expect. I will go into more detail on that later. As for the job that the committee did... I am far from impressed. Once again, there are multiple errors in team selection, seeding, and bracketing as a whole. Let's look at each one in turn. Did the Committee get the right 68 teams? More or less. This is the area where I am the least concerned. As I mentioned yesterday, my metrics had UNC safely in the field and not even in the First Four, but I swapped them out for WVU at the last minute. UNC's single Q1 win gave me too much pause. I felt slightly vindicated when UNC made it.  My biggest beef is with Texas making it in at 19-15. That's just too many loses. Yes, they had 7 Q1 wins, but that also had 5 loses outside of Q1 and an ov...

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2025 Edition)

For my money, we are all of the cusp of the best three weeks of the entire year. We just wrapped up two weeks of conference tournaments, but those were just an appetizer to the main course that is yet to come.  The powers that be gave us the menu on Sunday evening for the feast that is to come. Now it is time to enjoy a brief break and palette cleaner before we all make our selections. But what shall we choose? Which tasty little upset looks the best in the first round? Which teams are most likely to be sweet in the second weekend? Which quartet will comprise the final course? Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title. There is no foolproof way to dominate your...

2024 Week Eight Preview: OK Computer

Playing the first game after a bye week is like waking up from a nap. It is a little tough to predict how the body will respond. If a nap comes at just the right time and lasts for just the right length of time, it can be very refreshing and rejuvenating. But sometimes waking up for a nap can be rough. It can cause a disorienting, groggy feeling like suddenly two plus two equals five and that down is the new up. Based on the way the three weeks prior to the bye week went, last week's break at the midpoint of the season came at exactly the right time for the Spartans. Facing one top five team is challenging enough. Facing two top five teams on consecutive weekends including almost 5,000 miles of travel is something else entirely. But how will the rested Spartans look on the field come Saturday night? It is hard to predict what we are going to get. It is the classic "rest versus rust," million dollar question.  I prefer to be optimistic and to believe that the Spartans will...