Skip to main content

B1G Hoops Projections for 01/06/2020 (Post-UofM)

We are only 6 days into the new decade and it has already been a very positive year for MSU hoops.  The Spartans got two big wins since the calendar rolled over against Kenpom Top 40 teams.  Furthermore, two of MSU's potential title rivals (Purdue and Ohio State) both took an additional "L" in 2020 so far.  This is particularly significant since my preseason analysis suggested that those two teams (Purdue in particular) had a slight schedule advantage.  

But, how do the event impact the overall Big Ten race, numerically?   The following table gives the update Big Ten w:ins matrix and expected win totals after Sunday's action, using the updated Kenpom efficiency data:


For a more visual representation, here are the trends in expected wins back to the beginning of Big Ten play:




Amazingly, this analysis suggests that MSU has a 2.2 game lead in expected wins after only 4 games played.  That is absolutely huge.  For now, Ohio State still looks to be the biggest threat, with Maryland just a hair behind.  Those two teams will face each other tomorrow night at Maryland, so there is a good chance that Maryland will seize control of 2nd place.  That is certainly the current trend. 

After those top three, there is a real log-jam in the middle of the conference with 9 teams all projected to win between 9 and 11 games.  So far, Penn State, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Michigan are all trending towards 11 wins, Purdue, Rutgers, and Illinois project to win 10, and Minnesota and Indiana look to win 9.  

Northwestern and Nebraska are currently quite a ways back and are only projected to win 4 games.

As for the odds to win the conference (at least tie for 1st place), those odds are shown here, with the trends below:


As expected based on the previous table, MSU has a big lead in the odds department and now has a 74% chance to hang another banner.  OSU and Maryland check in at 19% and 14%, while the rest of the conference is at 5% or below.

While MSU is currently sitting pretty at 4-0, I think that it is important not to get too excited.  The math does suggest that a record of 16-4 or so will be enough to win the conference.  In fact, there is only a 25% chance that any team finishes at 17-3 or better.  In other words, losses are coming.  If nothing else, MSU has gotten the luxury of playing 3 of the first 4 conference games at home, and the one road game was against one of the two worst teams in the league.  Home teams are still 20-3 so far in conference play.  There is going to be a rough patch or two in the next 8 weeks.  Don't freak out when it happens.  

Fortunately, Kenpom data can also help us rank the remaining games from hardest to easiest.  Based on the current data, that list looks like this (with the win probability in parentheses):
  1. @ Maryland (47%)
  2. @ Michigan (54%)
  3. @ Purdue (57%)
  4. @ Wisconsin (57%)
  5. @ Penn St. (58%)
  6. @ Illinois (62%)
  7. @ Minnesota (64%)
  8. vs. Ohio St. (64%)
  9. @ Indiana (65%)
  10. vs. Maryland (72%)
  11. vs. Iowa (78%)
  12. vs. Wisconsin (79%)
  13. vs. Penn St. (80%)
  14. vs. Minnesota (84%)
  15. @ Nebraska (92%)
  16. vs. Northwestern (95%)

The toughest 5 road games all have win probabilities between 47% and 60%.  MSU will likely win 2-3 of those games.  The next 5 games all have win probabilities between 60% and 75%.  MSU should win 3 of those games.  The final 6 games have win probabilities between 75% and 95%.  MSU should win 5-6 of those games.  For better or worse, of the toughest 5 games, only the game @ Purdue is coming up in the next few weeks.

For MSU to be a champion, they just need to finish ahead of the curve in those three groups.  In other words, win 3 (not 2) of the toughest 5, and lose no more than 2 games in the bottom 10.  That gets you to 16-4 and earns you a banner (most likely). That is more wins than MSU is currently expected to win, based on raw probability (15.2, in the original table), but championship teams need to win more toss-ups than they lose.

It's early, but things are looking good so far for MSU.  Go Green.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2026 Edition)

In my opinion, the middle of March is the absolute best time of the year. Over the past two weeks we have witnessed the exciting conclusion of several regular season conference races, followed by 31 conference tournaments. This past weekend, the full 68-team NCAA Tournament bracket was released. Sports fanatics are on the brink of Madness. Who will play the role of Cinderella in the story of the 2026 tournament? Will any survive to reach the second weekend? Which four teams will advance to Indianapolis on that first weekend in April? Which lucky team will end up cutting down the nets?  Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn would win the National Title. There is no foolproof way t...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...

After a strong swing through the state of Indiana, March beckons for Michigan State basketball

I have a bit of a confession to make. Back in December when I was reviewing the overall Big Ten schedule for the Michigan State Spartans, I noticed the back-to-back games at Purdue and at Indiana at the tail end of the conference campaign.  The games were spaced just three days apart, and the Spartan have struggled noticeably in both buildings historically. Outside of possibly the west coast trip in January, this two-game stretch looked like the most subtly challenge portion of the entire schedule. I believed that just getting a split in two games would be a success But the Spartans surprised both me and the college basketball world be rising to the challenge and winning both games. Other Big Ten teams were not as fortunate this weekend as both Purdue and Illinois picked up an additional loss. Table 1 below shows the updated enhanced Big Ten standings following the weekend's action. Table 1 : Enhanced Big Ten standing as of March 2. Michigan's win over Illinois on Friday night ...