Skip to main content

B1G Hoops Projections for 01/13 (post Purdue)

Another weekend, another rough set of games for the road teams.  After Sunday's action, home teams are now 32-5 overall in Big Ten play. Unfortunately, MSU was one of those road teams on Sunday, and for those that didn't see the game... it didn't go well.  As a results, MSU picked up it's first loss in Big Ten play and dropped a bit in the Kenpom rankings as a result.  But, how much did this impact MSU's projected final record?  The table below shows the updated win matrix and expected win totals for all 14 Big Ten teams, followed by the visual trends back to the start of Big Ten play.





MSU's conference expected win total took a major hit, dropping from over 15.5 games to just a bit above 14. Only about a half game is that is based on the actual loss to Purdue (since in was a near toss-up game) so the other ~full game drop was due to a drop in MSU's kenpom efficiency margin and therefore on the odds for all remaining games.

But, the good news is that both Maryland and Ohio State also had some rough games recently, so MSU still maintained a game and a half lead in expected wins over the next closest team, which is still Maryland (12.2).  Purdue jumped up a bit in expected wins, as did Illinois, Iowa, and Indiana.  Penn State took a bit of a tumble.

The big picture, however, is unchanged, and that is MSU has a healthy lead, followed by Maryland, and then a half-step back from that is 10 of the remaining 12 teams how all project to win between 10 and 11 games.  Nebraska and Northwestern are not even on the lead lap.  As always, the trick for all of these teams will be to protect home court and try to steal as many road wins as possible.

As for the actual odds to win / share the Big Ten title, those are updated below:



MSU's odds took a big hit, yet at 66%, they are still clearly the best in the league.  As expected, Maryland is 2nd at 21%, and Wisconsin (8.1%) has now surged ahead of Ohio State (7.7%) for 3rd place. It is still somewhat baffling that the Buckeyes odds are still even that high considering their 1-4 record, but with a Kenpom efficiency margin ranked in the Top 10 still, they are still projected to win a lot of games.  We shall see.

Up until this weekend, it was starting to look like 16 wins might be needed to hang a banner.  But, now, the math says that a record of 15-5 may still be enough.  The eventual champ has 16 or more wins in only 22% of my current simulations.  In almost half of them (47%) the champ(s) only got to 14 or less.  Again, we shall see.

That's all for now.  Until next time, enjoy and Go Green.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...

After a strong swing through the state of Indiana, March beckons for Michigan State basketball

I have a bit of a confession to make. Back in December when I was reviewing the overall Big Ten schedule for the Michigan State Spartans, I noticed the back-to-back games at Purdue and at Indiana at the tail end of the conference campaign.  The games were spaced just three days apart, and the Spartan have struggled noticeably in both buildings historically. Outside of possibly the west coast trip in January, this two-game stretch looked like the most subtly challenge portion of the entire schedule. I believed that just getting a split in two games would be a success But the Spartans surprised both me and the college basketball world be rising to the challenge and winning both games. Other Big Ten teams were not as fortunate this weekend as both Purdue and Illinois picked up an additional loss. Table 1 below shows the updated enhanced Big Ten standings following the weekend's action. Table 1 : Enhanced Big Ten standing as of March 2. Michigan's win over Illinois on Friday night ...

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2026 Edition)

In my opinion, the middle of March is the absolute best time of the year. Over the past two weeks we have witnessed the exciting conclusion of several regular season conference races, followed by 31 conference tournaments. This past weekend, the full 68-team NCAA Tournament bracket was released. Sports fanatics are on the brink of Madness. Who will play the role of Cinderella in the story of the 2026 tournament? Will any survive to reach the second weekend? Which four teams will advance to Indianapolis on that first weekend in April? Which lucky team will end up cutting down the nets?  Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn would win the National Title. There is no foolproof way t...