Skip to main content

Parallel Universe March Madness: Regional Finals

As the world continues to fight and soldier on through the current tragedy and global crisis, we could all use a bit of a distraction. For me, it is therapeutic to think about a world without COVID-19 and in this world, the NCAA Tournament has reach the end of its second weekend.  For the last few weeks, as I hang out under lock-down at home with the fam in Michigan, I have been presenting the results of a single Monte Carlo simulation of the 2020 NCAA Tournament.  Here are the results of the Four Regional Final contests:

Midwest Region

No. 2 Michigan State downs No. 1 Kansas, 72-65

It was an epic battle in a game that many stated before hand might be the defacto National Title game. For two straight days, all the talk in the tournament was about MSU-Kansas and the game lived up to it billing. Both teams battled for 40 minutes and neither team led by more that 4 points for the first 38 minutes.  Kansas took the odd approach of focusing much of their defensive efforts on Rocket Watts.

As far as that goes, the strategy was reasonably effective, as Rocket was held to only seven points off five shots (all from three). But, when the brightest lights were on, MSU's brightest lights shined. Cassius Winston scored a game-high 26 points and 6 assists, including shooting 6-of-9 from three, two of which he sunk in the final two minutes to push the lead from one to seven.

Cash won the Midwest Regions Most Outstanding Player, based largely of his performance tonight.  So far in the tournament, Winston has averaged 17.3 points a game, and 6.3 assists

Aaron Henry once again was outstanding on defense and put up a reliable 12 points, 9 rebounds, and 4 assists.  For the tournament, Henry averaged 10.5 points, 7.7 rebounds, and 4.7 assists.

Xavier Tillman managed his second double-double with 10 points and 11 rebound, bring his average to 10.5 points and 10.8 rebound. Tillman was also named to the All-Midwest Region team.

Meanwhile, Malik Hall chipped in 7 points. Foster Loyer and Gabe Brown put up 5 points apiece off the bench.  In total, MSU shot 51% from the floor and 41% (11 for 27) from three.  Coach Izzo advances to his 9th Final Four in 25 magical seasons.

West Region

No. 5 Ohio State beats No. 3 Kentucky, 75-60

Despite the seeds, the Buckeyes actually entered the game as a slight (-3) favorite and blew the doors off the Wildcats with red-hot shooting from three.  This was a rematch of late December game between the two squads and the results were much the same.  Ohio State advances to their 12th overall Final Four, their fourth of the modern tournament era (since 1979) and their first since 2012.

East Region

No. 4 Maryland ends the run of No. 7 Arizona, 77-61

The Terps will move on the Atlanta to face a Michigan State team that already beat then twice in three tries this year (at least in the Parallel Universe).  Maryland advances to their third overall Final Four, making their first appearance since going back-to-back in 2001 and 2002.

South Region

No. 8 Saint Mary's upset No. 2 Creighton, 73-61

Cinderella is alive and well, and headed to Atlanta to face Ohio State next Saturday.  This is Saint Mary's first Final Four in program history and the farthest that they have advanced in the modern tournament since making the Sweet 16 in 2010.

In summary, the updated bracket is below:



My simulated Final Four wound up being made up of a No. 2, No. 4, No. 5, and No. 8 seed.  This seed distribution is a bit low, but not as extreme as 2011 (3,4,8, and 11) and similar to 2006 (2,3,4,11).

While I certainly would have been surprised to see three of the Final Four participants from the Big Ten, The B1G was clearly the strongest league in the country all year, so it would not have been a shock.  As for my Final Four picks... I went o-fer.  Better luck next year...

That is all for now, but next weekend is still the Final Four... somewhere.  Will MSU cut down the nets?  Tune in next Monday night to find out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2026 Edition)

In my opinion, the middle of March is the absolute best time of the year. Over the past two weeks we have witnessed the exciting conclusion of several regular season conference races, followed by 31 conference tournaments. This past weekend, the full 68-team NCAA Tournament bracket was released. Sports fanatics are on the brink of Madness. Who will play the role of Cinderella in the story of the 2026 tournament? Will any survive to reach the second weekend? Which four teams will advance to Indianapolis on that first weekend in April? Which lucky team will end up cutting down the nets?  Over the years I have developed a set of analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the mathematical underpinning of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. My methodology has a solid track record of correctly identifying upsets and sometimes doing more than that. In 2023, I used data to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn would win the National Title. There is no foolproof way t...

2025 College Football Analysis, Part Two: A Deep Dive into MSU's Schedule

In part one of this year's math-based preseason analysis of the college football season, we looked back at the 2024 season. Through that analysis, we learned about the historical accuracy of preseason polls (plus-or-minus 25 positions) and regular season win totals (plus-or-minus 2.5 wins). We also explored the impact of changes in ability, schedule, and luck. Now it is now time to shift focus to the 2025 season. Over the years I have developed and refined a way to simulate the entire college football season using schedule information and preseason rankings as the only inputs. I will soon go through the full details of what I learned from this exercise.  For today, I will focus exclusively on what it says about the Michigan State Spartans. We will take a close look at the Spartans' 2025 schedule from three different points of view. Opponent Overview The best place to start this analysis is with the simulation's inputs. Figure 1 below summarizes the preseason rankings (w...

After a strong swing through the state of Indiana, March beckons for Michigan State basketball

I have a bit of a confession to make. Back in December when I was reviewing the overall Big Ten schedule for the Michigan State Spartans, I noticed the back-to-back games at Purdue and at Indiana at the tail end of the conference campaign.  The games were spaced just three days apart, and the Spartan have struggled noticeably in both buildings historically. Outside of possibly the west coast trip in January, this two-game stretch looked like the most subtly challenge portion of the entire schedule. I believed that just getting a split in two games would be a success But the Spartans surprised both me and the college basketball world be rising to the challenge and winning both games. Other Big Ten teams were not as fortunate this weekend as both Purdue and Illinois picked up an additional loss. Table 1 below shows the updated enhanced Big Ten standings following the weekend's action. Table 1 : Enhanced Big Ten standing as of March 2. Michigan's win over Illinois on Friday night ...