Skip to main content

Hoops Analysis: Do the Spartans Have Bubble Trouble?

As we approach the end of January, a lot of college basketball discussion has turned to the NCAA Tournament. The question on everyone's mind right now is whether the Tournament is going to happen at all this year. As for now, the plan remains i place to the play the entire NCAA Tournament in the state of Indiana using (more or less) the normal schedule. 

However, as COVID-based pauses and cancelled or postponed games continue to mount, it is harder and harder to believe that this plan is going to actually work. That said, I do believe that the Tournament will happen this year, in some form. Will it contain 68 teams and will it actually take place in March? Those points, I believe, are still unclear.

As for MSU fans, the big question is whether or not the Spartans are going to be a part of the Big Dance at all this year. Right now, in the midst of a now three-week pause, Michigan State seems to be squarely on the bubble.  ESPN's Joe Lunardi has MSU as one of the last teams in.  In contrast, CBS's Jerry Palm has MSU as one of the last team's out.  

A comprehensive list of bracket projections is compiled on the Bracket Project website. According the latest update, MSU appears in 37 of the 75 published brackets (49.3 percent). In total, this data all suggests the same thing: MSU is currently squarely on the bubble.

If things go to plan on Thursday, MSU will take the court once again at Rutgers. It is hard to say how the Spartans will look after almost three weeks off.  Will the Spartans be rested or rusty?  We will all find out together. Either way, based on the current situation, if the Spartans can improve their play in their remaining games, they will likely make the Tournament. If they do not, then they probably won't.

But, as we approach Selection Sunday, what are some of the signs that MSU fans can look towards to judge if we will be able to breath easy or if we will be biting our nails on Selection Sunday?  Once metric to look for I have already mentioned above: the data from the Bracket Project.  In addition, I believe that there are three other factors that we can track for the remainder of the season.

Big Ten Record

In a normal year, it is pretty easy to look at team's final record overall as well as the final conference record to decide if that team in going to make the Tournament or not. As a very general rule, a Power Five team with at least 20 wins and a .500 record in conference play is usually in good shape. In 2021, the total number of wins is essentially irrelevant, but the conference record will certainly be a factor.

In years when the Big Ten is considered strong (like this year) a .500 conference record is a virtual guarantee for an at-large bid. In other years this is sometimes not the case. For example, Nebraska went 13-5 in 2018 and still wound up in the NIT. However, just as recently as 2019, both Minnesota (9-11 in conference play) and Ohio State (8-12) made the Tournament with losing conference records.

Just to give a few non-Big Ten examples, in 2019 Oklahoma went 7-11 in Big 12 play and still made the Tournament as a No. 9 seed. In 2018, Texas and Oklahoma earned bids with 8-10 conference records.  Kansas State did the same thing in 2017 with an 8-10 record. In 2015, Texas and Oklahoma State also made it in at 8-10.  In each of those years, Kenpom had the Big 12 rated as the No. 1 overall conference.

With the Big Ten sitting in the No. 1 spot this year in Kenpom's conference ranking, I would expect that any team that is within two games of .500 (or 8-12 with a full schedule) will get a serious look as a at-large bid. MSU needs to win about half of the remaining games to stay on this path. While my current calculations give MSU only a 13 percent chance to make it to 10-10, the odds to finish at at least 8-12 at at 46 percent right now.

I should also note that quality win are certainly a factor, but I am not currently worried about this variable. MSU's current NET rating is a concerning No. 84 and the Spartan's "Quad One" record is at 0-3. However, by my count MSU has a total of 11 Quad One games left (including all seven road games and home games versus Michigan, Illinois, Ohio State, and Iowa). So, for the Spartans to even get close to .500, some high quality wins will have to come along for the ride.

Big Ten Tournament

If MSU continue to flirt with the bubble for the rest of the regular season, the Big Ten Tournament is likely to be viewed as a bit of a tie-breaker.  Right now, most brackets have nine or ten Big Ten teams in the field. While the seed in the Big Ten tournament does not officially matter in NCAA Tournament selection, it does help with the optics. In this case, it would be a tremendous benefit for MSU to enter the Big Ten Tournament as least the No. 10 seed.

First off, this would strengthen the idea in the eyes of the committee that MSU is, in fact, a top ten Big Ten team. Furthermore, it would increase the odds that MSU would get at least one more quality win. One thing is certain, and that is that bubble teams who lose in the first game of a conference tournament seem to often not get the benefit of the doubt on Selection Sunday. MSU may very likely need to win at least one game to stay on the positive side of the bubble. 

Right now, I project MSU's odds to get at least the No. 10 seed in the conference tournament to be only at 37 percent.  If the Spartans do wind up playing on Wednesday, I think that two wins at least will be needed in order to go dancing.

Kenpom Rankings

While the committee does not officially use Kenpom efficiency data to evaluate or seed teams, it does provide a rich set of data that can give us hints as to the likelihood that a team like MSU will either make the tournament or not. In this case, I have some hard numbers to share.

I went back through Kenpom data back to 2011 when the tournament expanded to the current 68-team format. I tracked the final, pre-tournament rankings and adjusted efficiency margins for all non-conference champions and correlated those numbers to the odds that a team would make the tournament or not as an at-large team. The results are shown below in Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 1: Odds that a non-champion will be an at-large NCAA Tournament participant as a function of adjusted efficiency margin

Figure 2: Odds that a non-champion will be an at-large NCAA Tournament participant as a function of Kenpom ranking 

The shape of the data in both Figures is essentially the same and tells the same basic story. Good teams, with a Kenpom ranking of at least 25 and an adjusted efficiency margin of at least 18.0, almost always make the Tournament as an at-large team.

As the the overall ranking and efficiency margin drops, the odds that a team is an at-large selection also drops linearly. Once the adjected efficiency margin drops to 10.0 and the ranking drops below 70, the odds approach zero.

In both Figures I included Michigan State's current position, which is a No. 44 ranking and an adjusted efficiency margin of 16.3. In this case, the Kenpom data paints a slight happier picture. Based on MSU's ranking, the odds to make the Tournament are 58 percent. If we instead only focus on the raw adjusted efficiency data, the odds climb to 74 percent.

I would argue that the reason the Kenpom data is more optimistic has to do with the fact that MSU has been a bit unlucky so far in Big Ten play. If the Kenpom efficiency data is a true estimate of how "good" MSU really is, the Spartans really should be 3-3 right now and not 2-4.  If it weren't for about 20 seconds of bad luck and bad execution against the Boilermakers, that is exactly where MSU would be right now.

In other words, Kenpom data suggest that the Spartans are likely to regress to the mean over the rest of the season and perhaps steal a win or two in the back half of the season.  If this happens, then MSU will most likely find themselves on the positive side of the bubble on Selection Sunday, just as the data in Figures 1 and 2 suggest.

That is all for today. I will provide a new odds update on the full Big Ten picture prior to MSU's game (fingers crossed) on Thursday at Rutgers. Going forward, I am planning to revisit the metrics discussed above as MSU plays more games and as Selection Sunday approaches (also, fingers crossed).

Until next time, enjoy, and Go State, beat Rutgers!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Green and White Helps You Fill Out Your Bracket (2024 Edition)

For as long as I can remember, I have loved the NCAA Basketball Tournament. I love the bracket. I love the underdogs. I love One Shining Moment. I even love the CBS theme music. As a kid I filled out hand-drawn brackets and scoured the morning newspaper for results of late night games. As I got older, I started tracking scores using a increasing complex set of spreadsheets. Over time, as my analysis became more sophisticated, I began to notice certain patterns to the Madness I have found that I can use modern analytics and computational tools to gain a better understanding of the tournament itself and perhaps even extract some hints as to how the tournament might play out. Last year, I used this analysis to correctly predict that No. 4 seed UConn win the National Title in addition to other notable upsets. There is no foolproof way to dominate your office pool, but it is possible to spot upsets that are more likely than others and teams that are likely to go on a run or flame out early.

The Case for Optimism

In my experience there are two kinds of Michigan State fans. First, there are the pessimists. These are the members of the Spartan fan base who always expect the worst. Any amount of success for the Green and White is viewed to be a temporary spat of good luck. Even in the years when Dantonio was winning the Rose Bowl and Izzo was going to the Final Four, dark times were always just around the bend. Then, there are the eternal optimists. This part of the Spartan fan base always bets on the "over." These fans expect to go to, and win, and bowl games every year. They expect that the Spartans can win or least be competitive in every game on the schedule. The optimists believe that Michigan State can be the best Big Ten athletic department in the state. When it comes to the 2023 Michigan State football team, the pessimists are having a field day. A major scandal, a fired head coach, a rash of decommitments, and a four-game losing streak will do that. Less than 24 months after hoi

2023 Final Playoff and New Year's Six Predictions

The conference championships have all been played and, in all honesty, last night's results were the absolute worst-case scenario for the Selection Committee. Michigan and Washington will almost certainly be given the No. 1 and No. 2 seed and be placed in the Sugar Bowl and the Rose Bowl respectively. But there are four other teams with a reasonable claim on the last two spots and I have no idea what the committee is going to do. Florida State is undefeated, but the Seminoles played the weakest schedule of the four candidates and their star quarterbac (Jordan Travis) suffered a season ending injury in the second-to-last game of the regular season. Florida State is outside of the Top 10 in both the FPI and in my power rankings. I also the Seminoles ranked No. 5 in my strength of record metric, behind two of the other three candidates. Georgia is the defending national champions and were previously ranked No. 1 coming into the week. But after losing to Alabama in the SEC Title game,